FW: quick but time critical & important question

SUBJECT:

PRI: NORMAL

FROM:

N

ncallahan@rosemontseneca.com

DATE:

2010-12-06 04:47:40

MSG_ID:

<008c01cb9500$b7a343e0$26e9cba0$@com>

RECIPIENTS:

TO:

C

cheinz@rosemontseneca.com

D

'Devon Archer' <darcher@rosemontseneca.com>

H

'Hunter Biden' <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>

CONTENT: TEXT: YES | HTML: NO

PROCESSED

Upcoming press coverage on Cataphora - NYTimes, Forbes, etc.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
Neil Callahan
Rosemont Seneca
401 Greenwich Street, Suite 400 | New York NY 10013 | 212-933-9965 |
212-796-4037
1010 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 705 | Washington DC 20007 | 202-333-1880
917-945-9516 (mobile)
866-749-8879 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From: Elizabeth Charnock [mailto:ebc@cataphora.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 9:21 PM
To: Robert Mitchell; lyoung@ecsassociates.com
Cc: Neil Callahan; Rick Janowski
Subject: quick but time critical & important question

We've got some very likely big press coverage coming up: NYT, Forbes and Der
Spiegel. The NYT reporter seeing the "government" tab on the website said
that he presumed we were doing work in the IC "like Palantir but with much
more functionality." Since that seemed blazingly obvious and not a secret,
I said that "yes that was of great interest to us and we were starting to do
so." But that was all I said. I assume that that was okay to say. If not,
please advise what is okay to say.

/ebc
Elizabeth Charnock
CEO,Cataphora
www.cataphora.com
ebc@cataphora.com

METADATA:

THREAD:

INDEX: AcuU7Em1PBgb3X+SRIOZUmdIx5zqiwAFDOpg

EMAIL DETAILS