EMAIL DETAILS

I am free for a call between 12:30 and 3:30. Let me know what works.

On Mar 18, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Mesires, George R. <George.Mesires@FaegreBD.com<mailto:George.Mesires@FaegreBD.com>> wrote:

Hunt - Got your email. I am tied up this morning but can talk this afternoon. My knee jerk is not to file a TRO or protective order because it would be an admission that unflattering photos exist, which alone would set the internet abuzz. Interested to hear Sarah's view but can talk about it on a call. I'm going dark for about 2 hours. George

George R. Mesires
Partner
george.mesires@FaegreBD.com<mailto:george.mesires@FaegreBD.com> Download vCard<http://www.faegrebd.com/vcard/george.mesires.vcf>
D: +1 312 356 5101<tel:+1%20312%20356%205101> | M: +1 312 972 4151<tel:+1%20312%20972%204151>

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP<http://www.faegrebd.com/>
311 S. Wacker Drive | Suite 4300 | Chicago, IL 60606, USA<x-apple-data-detectors://10/1>

On Mar 18, 2017, at 8:49 AM, Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com<mailto:hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>> wrote:

Please don't include Eric unless it has to do with records or book keeping etc- thanks. And I have CC'd George. So implicit in this response is that she has picture but at the moment does not intend to release them. It does not address the fact that the threat was made which is a felony in and of itself- nor does it deny the existence of any ill gained material. You think they would want to be pretty emphatic on these points in light of the law. Do you have any opinion? Is there any other development? The Washington post continues to press regarding Roxannes intention to do "a long piece" and I would rather have moved over into litigation allowing us to comment and file our response then be caught in this absurd limbo. Did you express that I no longer am inclined to negotiate? They seem to have not understood? Finally if this is there response why wouldn't we file a restraining order based simply on the threat and the implied existence of photos? Is there a chance you could speak by telephone in the near future?

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 17, 2017, at 3:45 PM, SMancinelli <SMancinelli@ainbanklaw.com<mailto:SMancinelli@ainbanklaw.com>> wrote:

Please see below.


Begin forwarded message:

From: "Rebekah J.H. Sullivan" <RSullivan@ksfmlaw.com<mailto:RSullivan@ksfmlaw.com>>
Date: March 17, 2017 at 3:44:26 PM EDT
To: "SMancinelli (SMancinelli@ainbanklaw.com<mailto:SMancinelli@ainbanklaw.com>)" <smancinelli@ainbanklaw.com<mailto:smancinelli@ainbanklaw.com>>
Cc: "Meg McKinney (mmckinney@delaneymckinney.com<mailto:mmckinney@delaneymckinney.com>)" <mmckinney@delaneymckinney.com<mailto:mmckinney@delaneymckinney.com>>
Subject: Pictures Concern

Sarah,

Meg passed along to me that Hunter is concerned Kathleen may release pictures of him to the tabloids/press or others if he does not sign the version of the agreement we sent. Please accept my assurance that she has no intention of doing so. She has every hope that the parties are able to reach a fair and equitable agreement through good faith negotiations.

Sincerely,

Rebekah J.H. Sullivan
Kuder, Smollar, Friedman & Mihalik, PC
1350 Connecticut Ave. NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20036

www.KSFMLAW.com<http://www.ksfmlaw.com/>
Tel: 202/331-7522
Fax: 202/331-0388


[cid:image002.png@01D2879A.7900E1E0]

******NOTICE*********
This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s)
above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product
or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this
message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify
the sender at (202) 331-7522 and delete this e-mail message from your computer.
Thank You.

<image001.png