EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
RHB
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
G
george.mesires@faegrebd.com
DATE:
2017-03-17 18:51:33
MSG_ID:
<42083C1EC3CF1741BA2902F1A0AB5EF919829B30@S01P-EXCHDAG4.intfirm.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
S
smancinelli@ainbanklaw.com
CC:
H
hbiden@rosemontseneca.com
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Sarah - I haven't looked as to whether there are any analogous cases interpreting the DC blackmail statute, but below is a thread to chase down under DC case law. George From: Mesires, George R. Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 10:57 AM To: Mesires, George R. Subject: http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/JN/JNJournal01.nsf/c0d731e03de9828d852574580042ae7a/d4773fb28226a45a852575c5004c9195!OpenDocument&Highlight=0,extortion:,what,your,client,wants* George R. Mesires Partner george.mesires@FaegreBD.com<mailto:george.mesires@FaegreBD.com> Download vCard<https://www.faegrebd.com/vcard/george.mesires.vcf> D: +1 312 356 5101 | M: +1 312 972 4151 Faegre Baker Daniels LLP<https://www.FaegreBD.com> 311 S. Wacker Drive | Suite 4300 | Chicago, IL 60606, US
METADATA:
THREAD:
TOPIC:
RHB
INDEX:
AdKfT37w1rtdCsiSSwGb5XmcBi1t2A==