EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Re: SunRail ticket revenue is less than ticketing expense - Orlando Sentinel
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
C
crengineer@aol.com
DATE:
2017-02-27 18:40:46
MSG_ID:
<1AFFF08A-14BE-4CCF-B6A6-1347F3966809@aol.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
T
Thomas Carper
<tomcarper@msn.com>
CC:
H
Biden R. Hunter
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
J
Boardman Joe
<joebdot@hotmail.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Considering Mica supported it. Nope Sent from my iPhone someplace in North America > On Feb 27, 2017, at 13:33, Thomas Carper <TomCarper@msn.com> wrote: > > not to surprised, are you? > > > Tom Carper > > 309 313 3525 Cell > > > > From: Brian Gallagher <crengineer@aol.com> > Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 3:52 AM > To: Carper Thomas; Boardman Joe; Biden R. Hunter > Subject: SunRail ticket revenue is less than ticketing expense - Orlando Sentinel > > > http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/sunrail/os-sunrail-fares-lose-money-20170224-story.html > > SunRail ticket revenue is less than ticketing expense > www.orlandosentinel.com > It’s no secret that tickets bought by SunRail passengers pay only a tiny fraction of the commuter train’s bills, but less known is that ticket revenue doesn’t ... > > > > > Sent from my iPhone someplace in North Americ
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhpJNMOsQukHn4TmOFLdey1KwvPg==
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<DM5PR1601MB122718C3EAFEB7B73C5D44A9A4570@DM5PR1601MB1227.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
REFS:
<EA384DFE-7F80-42B7-97B4-970127AE6F49@aol.com>
<DM5PR1601MB122718C3EAFEB7B73C5D44A9A4570@DM5PR1601MB1227.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>