RE: Agenda_a.pptx - AFL - CIO Agenda (Revised)

SUBJECT:

PRI: NORMAL

FROM:

M

mike@mmathisgroup.com

DATE:

2011-06-09 16:46:52

MSG_ID:

<00ab01cc26c4$d6bc4550$8434cff0$@com>

RECIPIENTS:

TO:

B

'Brian R. Lang' <blang@guardianrealty.com>

C

'Chuck Harple' <charple@att.blackberry.net>

H

'Hunter Biden' <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>

CC:

E

'Eric Schwerin' <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>

CONTENT: TEXT: YES | HTML: YES

PROCESSED

Looks good to me. were you going to have a final slide titled "Next Steps"?
I think it makes sense to send a final version to Kirk at the AFL-CIO if
others agree. however, if we're doing that then we need to view this final
product in that light, with consideration as to how it will look to them w/o
someone from Guardian to explain it to them when they receive it. It might
make sense to just hold it and pas it out at the mtg unless they ask for an
agenda. Thoughts?


From: Brian R. Lang [mailto:blang@guardianrealty.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 12:20 PM
To: Hunter Biden; Chuck Harple; Mike Mathis
Cc: Eric Schwerin
Subject: Agenda_a.pptx - AFL - CIO Agenda (Revised)


Gentlemen:


Attached please find the revised and updated agenda pursuant to our
conversation yesterday. At your earliest convenience, please review and
comment where necessary. Do you think you will send a "blessed version" to
the AFL CIO so they know the agenda?


Warmest regards,


Brian

METADATA:

THREAD:

INDEX: AcwmwS89Av5ZeU4jRLq8/eusDDR2kwAAwX0A

REFERENCES:

REPLY_TO:

<EC3A09C6DB92814FBABDB1716B170F6C8F9EA8@guardian04.Guardian-realty.local>

REFS:

<EC3A09C6DB92814FBABDB1716B170F6C8F9EA8@guardian04.Guardian-realty.local>

EMAIL DETAILS