EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
2018 Election: Isolationist or internationalist wave?
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
L
liz.schrayer@usglc.org
DATE:
2018-11-08 02:29:56
MSG_ID:
<576481b9bf7d478aa888701d933b1ec3@usglc.org>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
As Washington scrambles to interpret the 2018 midterm election results, one thing is certain: there are two narratives about who won, a likely precursor to more gridlock in our soon-to-be divided government. For the USGLC, this election was never about a blue or red wave, but rather a critical question: Would the midterms bring an isolationist or internationalist wave? We set out 18 months ago to meet with more than 300 candidates and campaigns for the House and Senate - an unprecedented volume of engagement - to discuss America's global leadership and its importance for advancing U.S. economic and security interests. Based on hundreds of these face-to-face conversations - led by local business, veteran, faith, and community leaders - candidates embraced the importance of America's role in the world, rejected isolationism, and most are heading to Washington with an appreciation for diplomacy and foreign assistance. Read on below for our top election takeaways including the complexities of the election - and its implications on foreign policy. Click Here for the Full Report: http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=0D25ETEMls8dpLFZhwvzjA Best, Liz Liz Schrayer, USGLC After Tumultuous Midterm Cycle, Strong Signals for Internationalist Congress November 2018 >> Get the USGLC's Complete 2018 Election Analysis - including details on the House and Senate and freshmen profiles http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=zqqD1DoYMCMHbmE9AQp0ZA 1. Foreign Policy Not a Driver, But Still Matters BY THE NUMBERS. Foreign policy rarely drives voter priorities in midterm elections, and this cycle was no different with less than 1 in 5 voters citing "foreign policy" or "terrorism" as one of their most important issues. This contrasts against the 2016 presidential cycle, when exit polls found that foreign policy was either "extremely" or "very" important to 4 out of 5 voters. CAMPAIGN ADS. While hot button international issues - including increasing competition with China, trade, and tensions with North Korea, Iran, and Russia - certainly made headlines over the past year, these issues rarely took center stage on the campaign trail. * An analysis by the USGLC of television campaign ads through the end of October 2018 found that only 2% of more than 2.3 million ad runs had an "international affairs" theme. FOREIGN POLICY MATTERS. Voters rated health care and the economy as their top issues. An exception in the closing weeks of the race on foreign policy was the heightened attention to the caravan from Central America along with calls for nationalism. * Yet despite the prioritization of the domestic agenda, voter sentiment about America's global engagement remained extremely high. In a recent survey by the Chicago Council of Global Affairs, 70% of Americans want the U.S. to play an "active role" in the world, the highest level since 1974, with the exception of immediately after the 9/11 attacks. 2. Candidates Embrace U.S. Global Engagement STRONG INSTINCTS. In the more than 300 face-to-face meetings that USGLC leaders held with House and Senate candidates and their senior campaign advisors in some of the most competitive races across the country, candidates showed no signs of isolationism - even in an election defined by domestic issues and in an "America First" era. * Instead, candidates displayed strong instincts that America must be engaged on the global stage. One Senate candidate from a traditional red state opened our meeting stating, "I am not an isolationist!" Another Senate candidate said, "I haven't traveled very much, only to 48 countries." BLANK SLATE. While several incoming members of the House have strong foreign policy experience - as veterans or with former government service - most candidates showed up to our meetings with limited foreign policy experience and expertise. However, they consistently arrived highly eager to learn and engage - taking time from the campaign trail to discuss foreign policy. * In meeting after meeting with local business, veteran, faith and community leaders, the return on investment for global engagement for their state and district resonated with candidates - and they were keen to learn more specifics. * Indicative of the meetings, one Senate candidate in a tight race said, "I couldn't agree more with your positions. It is better to spend resources upfront and save lives than spend more money later and lose lives. You will not have to worry about my vote." 3. Foreign Aid Not An Issue, Candidates Receptive NON-ISSUE. Following the trend of most election cycles, foreign assistance largely remained out of the spotlight and was rarely mentioned throughout the vast majority of the 2018 campaign. In reviewing thousands of campaign ads, only one candidate - who lost in the primary - specifically mentioned cutting foreign assistance CARAVAN FOCUS. As the migration debate surged in October on the campaign trail, the president called for cutting foreign assistance to Central America. While this was quickly countered by leading Members of Congress - like Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) - congressional candidates were surprised to learn that only 0.00035% of our federal budget addresses the Northern Triangle. CANDIDATES RECEPTIVE. Despite some candidates' limited knowledge of global development, we encountered a broad openness to how effective U.S. foreign assistance can be an important tool in advancing America's interests, especially given the global competition from China and their growing investments in the developing world. * As one Republican Senate candidate said in a meeting, "These are issues which align with my core beliefs... both a strong military and engagement on humanitarian needs are critical parts of an American global leadership strategy." POLICY PLATFORMS. The USGLC also analyzed the web sites of candidates in the open and most competitive races this cycle and found that just about half of major party candidates featured a formal foreign policy or national security platform as an issue section. None advocated for foreign assistance cuts and close to a dozen House candidates mentioned America's civilian toolkit including diplomacy and global development programs. * Senator-elect Mitt Romney (R-UT), who has said he wants to join the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and speak out on the importance of America's role abroad, stated in his campaign platform: "We must promote our values of freedom and free enterprise through our diplomacy, economic ties, alliances and other soft power tools." Representative-elect Mikie Sherrill (D-NJ), a former Navy fighter pilot, stated "cuts to the State Department prevent us from dealing with developing international crises." 4. Committee Leadership Shifts with Key Retirements, Returning Friends DEPARTING CHAMPIONS. As the 115th Congress comes to a close, key foreign policy luminaries - including Chairmen Bob Corker (R-TN) and Ed Royce (R-CA) - are retiring and leaving big shoes to fill. Others champions leaving Congress include Senator Jeff Flake (R-AZ), House Appropriations Chairman Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-NJ), Reps. Peter Roskam (R-IL) and Tim Walz (D-MN), and many others. MUSICAL CHAIRS. With leadership and committee contests now on the horizon, there will be plenty of drama in the House. Long-time champion State-Foreign Operations Appropriations leader Nita Lowey (D-NY) is expected to take the gavel of the full Committee, and Ranking Member Elliot Engel (D-NY) will lead the way on Foreign Affairs. * Familiar faces are also in the mix vying for the ranking member seats on House Appropriations and Foreign Affairs, and the biggest upper chamber move - at the moment - is Senator Jim Risch (R-ID), who is expected to take the helm of the Foreign Relations Committee. For more on retirements, losses, returning friends, and committee shifts, see the full report. 5. New Faces, Freshmen Veterans Set to Reshape Hill VETERAN VOICES. With more than 400 veterans having run this cycle - twice as many as past elections - engagement with these candidates underscored how veterans are consistently some of the most powerful champions for resources for America's civilian overseas toolkit. The election now ushers into the House at least 17 new freshman veterans along with several former national security officials. NATIONAL SECURITY STANDOUTS. A number of winning House candidates will bring impressive backgrounds that can help drive support for international engagement: * Dan Crenshaw (R-TX-2) - Former Navy SEAL and has expressed support for civilian diplomatic and development agencies in partnership with Department of Defense * Young Kim (R-CA-39) - Former staffer for House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce * Tom Malinowski (D-NJ-7) - Former diplomat who served as Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor * Mikie Sherrill (D-NJ-11) - Former Navy fighter pilot, has called for "fully-staffed State Department to carry out the hard, necessary work of strategic diplomacy" * Elissa Slotkin (D-MI-8) - Former CIA officer, who worked in the intelligence community during Bush and Obama Administrations * Abigail Spanberger (D-VA-7) - Former CIA officer, has called for supporting diplomats as part of U.S. national security strategy * Mike Waltz (R-FL-6) - Former Army Green Beret veteran, who authored the book Warrior Diplomat CHAMBER JUMP. Also of note, soon-to-be former House members headed to the Senate have shown real leadership, including Senators-elect Kevin Cramer (R-ND) and Jacky Rosen (D-NV) - along with both Arizona candidates, Reps. Martha McSally (R-AZ) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) currently in a race that is too close to call. See Senate section below for more details. 6. Opportunities for Bipartisanship Despite Expected Gridlock NEXT MOVES. With a divided government, the tension is expected to run high as House Democrats increase their oversight authority over the executive branch - with most pundits predicting that not a lot will get done on Capitol Hill. Yet, in addition to infrastructure, perhaps global development could once again be a unifying agenda for Republicans and Democrats. BIPARTISANSHIP? In recent years, lawmakers built a strong legacy, having passed close to a dozen pieces of bipartisan legislation to strengthen America's global development investments around the world - from food security to energy to development finance to women and girls. This could be a bright spot to watch. BUDGET DEAL? Another area where policymakers could look to find the art of the deal is the ticking clock on next year's spending levels. In the last Congress, Democrats and Republicans worked together to pass a two-year budget deal that lifted the 2011 spending caps, which will expire at the end of Fiscal Year 2019. Without a new deal to replace it, defense and non-defense programs will see deep cuts from sequestration. 7. Long-Term Impact of Nationalism Debate in Closing Days: Unclear RHETORICAL WINDS. Themes from the "America First" 2016 campaign trail returned in the final weeks of the midterm, with the president focusing his closing arguments on nationalism, citing fears of the caravan and immigration issues. Pundits are still sorting through the data to decipher the impact of how these themes motivated voters in deep red states while turning off voters in swing suburban districts. * The fresh campaign rhetoric will continue to generate debate and impact our fabric as a nation - but how much this division will ultimately translate into policy or legislation remains to be seen. 8. Countdown to 2020: 730 Days WHEELS UP. Campaign 2020 began in earnest this morning, as President Trump prepares to head overseas to mark the centennial anniversary of the end of World War I - followed by the G20 at the end of the month. This pace of international travel and continued engagements with leaders from Russia and North Korea, means foreign policy and national security will be thrust into the spotlight. As Democrats prepare their legislative agenda for the next Congress, nearly two dozen Democratic candidates are already testing the waters for their party's presidential nomination. COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF. Inevitably, no presidential election can avoid a robust discussion of national security. While the diplomacy and development agenda in Congress has remained fiercely bipartisan, the highly polarized nature of current political environment will put that tradition to the test. Against the backdrop of immense challenges and opportunities on the global stage, the 2020 campaign will showcase how it is more important than ever for America's interests and values that we remain actively engaged and a leader in the world. >> Get the USGLC's Complete 2018 Election Analysis - including details on the House and Senate and freshmen profiles http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=2idJliwekOgyGUNJYCMfwQ The U.S. Global Leadership Coalition 1129 20th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036 Manage Subscriptions: http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=6R3caGalvNyElZtSTuXM4g Unsubscribe: http://action.usglc.org/site/CO?i=qpz-jt3_jTieWcE7Xy5BtguZTUTvuyHL&cid=1205&action=FALSE&events=TRUE&news=TRUE&daily=FALSE&weekly=TRUE&email=hbiden@rosemontseneca.com Not on our list yet? Subscribe Here: http://action.usglc.org/site/R?i=ooDCVrGJSKmDgBkuAypm
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhpZ8BC2z3v5wpQnOasVOJgkNA4w==