EMAIL DETAILS

Okay great thank you.


Heather King, Esq.
Partner
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
5301 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20015
202-274-1129 (Phone)
202-237-6131 (Fax)
hking@bsfllp.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Vadim Pozharskyi [v.pozharskyi.ukraine@gmail.com<mailto:v.pozharskyi.ukraine@gmail.com>]
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 06:52 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: Heather King
Cc: Hunter Biden (hbiden@rosemontseneca.com); Devon Archer (darcher@rosemontseneca.com); alan.apter@burisma.com
Subject: Re: Privileged and Confidential

Dear Heather,
fully realize the importance of hiring the Nardello company. I am traveling next 2 days and on Wednesday morning European time will have meeting with Shareholder to discuss inter alias this issue. Will get back to you on this on Wednesday. Due to the fact that last days he was not in the country we did not have chance to discuss such sensitive issue in proper way face to face.
best regards, Vadym

Отправлено с iPad

25 мая 2014, в 21:19, Heather King <hking@BSFLLP.com<mailto:hking@BSFLLP.com>> написал(а):

Vadim – I am writing to once again urge Burisma to approve the hiring of the research company I recommended: Nardello. Their work will be critical to everything else we want to do to help you – legal, PR and lobbying – and should begin immediately. I have listed below some of the reasons I think Nardello is the right choice and why, in particular, Kroll is not the right choice for this work:


1. This case would be personally managed by Dan Nardello. He is a reputable former federal prosecutor in the U.S. and is an expert on corruption issues. He and other members of his team, who would work on this matter, have superior anti-corruption credentials and all of their research would be informed by that. This expertise will help us gather the right information to make our case that the Ukrainian government is abusing the law if they do something like try to take Burisma’s licenses or prosecute your executives. In addition, it will help to tell the U.S. government that a company with Nardello’s reputation, and no pre-existing relationship with Burisma, examined Burisma.

2. I do not believe Kroll can offer us the personal attention of senior professionals with such anti-corruption expertise. Kroll is much more of a formal corporate structure where you are relegated to local offices and don’t get access to the same level of judgment and expertise.

3. Kroll has a reputation for white-washing and are not as trusted for due diligence work in the U.S. right now. For example, Kroll was hired to conduct due diligence related to a man named Allen Stanford. They did not do thorough research and they understated very significant issues, to great consequence. (If you Google Allen Stanford and Kroll you will see many reports of this and here is one: http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20090717/NEWS01/907179986#)

4. Nardello has done a lot of work in Ukraine and in the region as a whole. We will benefit greatly from their familiarity with the politics in the region, their past research, and their network within Ukraine.

5. Nardello has an acute legal understanding of what needs to be examined and reported on, due to the former prosecutors that lead their work.

6. I have heard reports of Kroll’s lack of professionalism and quality control generally (they are known for going over budget, missing deadlines, and having junior people do most of the work).

Heather King, Esq.
Partner
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
5301 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20015
202-274-1129 (Phone)
202-237-6131 (Fax)
hking@bsfllp.com<mailto:hking@bsfllp.com>


________________________________
IRS Circular 230 disclosure:
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, unless we expressly state otherwise, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

________________________________
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1]

________________________________
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1]