EMAIL DETAILS

M

I'm around today so give me a time and I'll call, Rob is traveling to Sierra Leone, but I have a few ideas I'm sure you do too.

J

Sent from my iPhone

> On 23 May 2016, at 23:04, Michael Gottlieb <MGottlieb@BSFLLP.com> wrote:
>
> Should we hop on a call in the next 24 hrs to figure out who else, if anyone, we would invite to the meeting?
>
> From: hbiden@rosemontseneca.com [mailto:hbiden@rosemontseneca.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 7:19 PM
> To: Michael Gottlieb
> Cc: james gilliar; Rob Walker (rob@rstp.com); James Gilliar (james.gilliar@j2cr.com)
> Subject: Re: Romania DNA
>
> Agreed Michael. Is now the time to begin to assemble a more high profile team that can speak to the injustice here. Who do we have at the firm that can speak with authority about anti-corruption. Mike I was going to reach out to Judge Freeh and if you can think of others of that stature I think now is the time to read them into the situation and see if they are willing to help. Ambassador Gittenstein mentioned names like former US Atty Patrick Fitzgerald.
>
> RHB
> 202-333-1880
>
> On May 17, 2016, at 6:25 PM, Michael Gottlieb <MGottlieb@BSFLLP.com> wrote:
>
> And just to update you and where we stand, I have reached out to Klemm and asked him to help us broker the meeting. Rob is reaching out to Andrea to ask whether she can figure out the procedures used to request a meeting with DNA. If we are going to do this we should do it right – we should put together a persuasive deck with all the procedural and substantive defects in the indictment / case against Gabs, and we should also probably put together the start of what would be a press strategy. And we’ll want to line up the big names to bring over. I’d expect we only get one shot to do this.
>
> From: Michael Gottlieb
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 6:20 PM
> To: 'james gilliar'
> Cc: Rob Walker (rob@rstp.com); hbiden@rosemontseneca.com; James Gilliar (james.gilliar@j2cr.com)
> Subject: RE: Romania DNA
>
> You’re missing my point – I’m not saying that we can’t or shouldn’t do anything – I’m just saying that given that this is the perception, it would explain why we have had difficulty getting traction at the USEMB. It’s probably worth explaining this to the client, who in my opinion has unrealistic expectations regarding what the USEMB can / will do. I have tried to be VERY clear from the start that I did not think that the USEMB would play an active role in his case, and that the most that they might do is ask questions or broker a meeting for us. I am fearful that he has a different impression.
>
> From: james gilliar [mailto:jamesgilliar@icloud.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 11:50 AM
> To: Michael Gottlieb
> Cc: Rob Walker (rob@rstp.com); hbiden@rosemontseneca.com; James Gilliar (james.gilliar@j2cr.com)
> Subject: Re: Romania DNA
>
> All the more reason not to have their credibility damaged by exposing the
> Cases where extortion by senior political
> Officials is carried out by the persons charged with protecting / changing the legal system ?.
>
> It's pretty clear cut, let's reach out for the meeting or go media in US
>
> J
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 17 May 2016, at 16:24, Michael Gottlieb <MGottlieb@BSFLLP.com> wrote:
>
> http://www.politico.eu/article/the-dna-of-romanias-anti-corruption-success-eu-transparency-international/
>
> This kind of article is likely to make our efforts with the USEMB an uphill battle, and why I expect HK has had little interest in taking any kind of public position.
>
> Michael J. Gottlieb
> Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
> 5301 Wisconsin Avenue NW
> Washington, DC 20015
> (202) 237-9617 (office)
> (202) 744-0858 (mobile)
> mgottlieb@bsfllp.com
>
>
> The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1]
>
> The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1]
>
> The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1