EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Re: MOU with Transatlantic
FROM:
D
darcher@rosemontseneca.com
DATE:
2010-07-19 04:24:33
MSG_ID:
<863441129-1279513472-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1822557665-@bda2610.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
E
Eric D. Schwerin
<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
I'm in agreement. Let me know what forum / format you'd like to relay our positions from and what I should be delivering as a follow-up to yours and Abel's meeting. Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -----Original Message----- From: Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com> Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:40:59 To: Eric Schwerin<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com> Cc: Devon Archer<darcher@rosemontseneca.com> Subject: Re: MOU with Transatlantic Hold firm on 60/4. We invoice- the group that does the actual work invoices. I won't pay a dime of legal expenses for Ormazabal. No need for a discussion with me- if they don't agree I propose we end the relationship completely. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 18, 2010, at 6:57 PM, Eric Schwerin <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com> wrote: > Think I told both of you about my meeting with Abel on the MOU and other things related to Transatlantic. Abel and I agreed we need to finalize the MOU ASAP so we can all be on the same page going forward. > > Some questions we need to decide amongst the three of us. > > 1) We proposed CAF be split 60/40 on BOTH the retainer and any future success fees/equity. Lorenzo and Abel think only the retainer should be split 60/40 and any incentive fees split 50/50. Of course I explained that we were giving up the chance for 75% of Talgo to take CAF so going to 60% was us going more than halfway and seemed fair. I also mentioned that we gave up $10K a month for Ormazabal. Abel countered that Talgo had no success fee so we aren't giving that up. I don't care strongly but I would like them to ultimately recognize what we are giving up to continue the relationship. > > 2) Who does the invoicing on each client. I proposed alternating, Abel proposed that the originator invoice. > > 3) Ormazabal - we came to an agreement on expenses. I don't know what the agreement is on legal fees. And also while it is not in the MOU I wonder whether we should have some understanding of the amount of work we will do on a day-to-day basis for Ormazabal so the expectations aren't out of whack. > > We can get on the phone in the next day or two to discuss, but I would like to get this finalized and behind us sooner rather than later (as I know both of you would too). > > Just wanted to put the issues on the table for you each to think about. > > Best, > > Eric > > -- > Eric D. Schwerin > Rosemont Seneca Partners > (202) 333-1880 > eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com >
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhqAwrcFTgrG2wQ4+wFWMufFd1wA==
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<E50F09C4-0ACE-4D5E-BD31-92B2759718F7@rosemontseneca.com>
REFS:
<AANLkTinOcwsEruuhQwFbo44GKCUpmFyqBbR3vzMe493K@mail.gmail.com><E50F09C4-0ACE-4D5E-BD31-92B2759718F7@rosemontseneca.com>