EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Draft FL HSR RFQ
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
M
mmuldoon@rosemontseneca.com
DATE:
2010-12-16 22:12:37
MSG_ID:
<AANLkTinn56MKBpzaaOQBdxM90T52aWqZxF22urxL2t-r@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
A
Abel Navarro
<abel@transatlanticeg.com>
C
Caitlin Yardeny
<caitlin@transatlanticeg.com>
D
Devon Archer
<darcher@rosemontseneca.com>
E
Eric Schwerin
<eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
L
Lorenzo Roccia
<lorenzo@transatlanticeg.com>
P
Pio Mortera Nales
<pio@transatlanticeg.com>
R
Rob Walker
<rwalker@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: NO
PROCESSED
Good Afternoon Guys, FL Rail Enterprise posted another DRAFT RFQ today. There is still two sections where they specifically mention the speed requirement: 1) Under the definition section (page 5): "Rolling Stock – Comprises all rail vehicles that the Proposer team intends to provide, including rolling stock for revenue and non-revenue operations. FDOT anticipates requiring under the RFP that the Proposers’ passenger train sets shall be electric steel-wheel-on-steel rail, with a pedigree of proven and demonstrable passenger service history; train sets must be capable of operating at speeds of at least 186 mph/300 kph or greater." ------- Again, here it mentions that the trains must be capable of 186mph or faster, but doesnt specify having a proven record of going 186mph. 2) Under the experience section (page 29-30): "In addition, FDOT desires the team members to have, respectively, the levels of experience set forth in this Section 6.3.1(b). V. Lead Rolling Stock Manufacturer A Rolling Stock manufacturer that has design, manufacturing, testing and delivery experience within the past five years, having supplied at least one project, with electric steel-wheel-on-steel-track passenger trains capable of minimum operating speeds of at least 186 mph/300kph with a proven and demonstrable passenger service history. These requirements can be satisfied by joint venture. --------- Here the keywords are "FDOT desires" in combination with the speed requirement. The biggest difference in this version versus the others is that they added the last sentence: "These requirements can be satisfied by joint venture." It is also interesting to note that under the technical requirements (page 23) for rolling stock it states in the footer: "DRAFTING NOTE: Additional specific submission requirements related to this reference to the Proposed Lead Rolling Stock Manufacturer to be developed." It looks as though all of the requirements regarding joining a team after it has been shortlisted are the same (pages 8-9). I'm still looking through the copy but wanted to get it out to you guys ASAP. I'll circulate any additional comments I have and let me know your thoughts on the JV piece. Best, Mike -- Mike Muldoon Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW Suite 705 Washington, DC 20007 (202) 333-1880 mmuldoon@rosemontseneca.co
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhqEuejqCQNHeMR42nVr1zg5d3bw==