EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Julianna's Agreement
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
E
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
DATE:
2014-04-16 17:01:54
MSG_ID:
<ADB5C3CB-C900-409C-B2D7-C35A3159CE3C@rosemontseneca.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
J
John DeLoche
<jdeloche@rosemontseneca.com>
W
Will Lee
<wlee@rosemontseneca.com>
CC:
H
Hunter Biden
<hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Guys: Attached is the redlined version of Julianna's agreement as marked up by her lawyer. The major change is making the agreement with the Smoot Tewes Group instead of Julianna herself but the agreement specifies Julianna is providing the services. The only other major change I notice is the definition of what constitutes "cause" for termination is deleted. There are also some stylistic language changes regarding the repayment of any fees received should this agreement be terminated, but they don't look substantive to me. I don't think we should have any issues with the changes they made, but would be interested if everyone else agrees. If so, I can send the clean version and this can be executed ASAP. Let me know. Best, Eric =2
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhqJQ0FR7RAMLhRQe5caElU2jk+Q==