EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Daily News Clips 4/8/14
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
S
sam@beaubiden.com
DATE:
2014-04-08 14:41:30
MSG_ID:
<CABDsjWjL1-+kYjWV0G1b_=EMvG6L723FrbcHoZaZbw=CzUiSJw@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
U
undisclosed-recipients:
BCC:
H
hbiden@rosemontseneca.com
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
*National News:* *UConn beats Kentucky for the men's NCAA basketball crown* The University of Connecticut basketball team, led by seasoned star guard Shabazz Napier, defeated the freshmen-led Kentucky Wildcats 60-54 to win the NCAA men's basketball championship<http://theweek.com/article/index/259533/speedreads-uconn-beats-kentucky-to-claim-the-ncaa-mens-title> Monday night. The difference came at the free-throw line, where UConn went 10 for 10, and Kentucky was 13 for 24. The win -- the Huskies' fourth championship since 1999 -- came a year after an academic ban kept the team out of the tournament. [*CNN*<http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/07/us/ncaa-basketball-championship/index.html?hpt=hp_t2> ] .......................................................................................... *Senate approves restoring benefits for the long-term unemployed* Senate Democrats, with help from six Republicans, pushed through a bill on Monday seeking torestore expired jobless benefits<http://theweek.com/article/index/259536/speedreads-the-senate-passed-its-bipartisan-unemployment-benefits-bill-sending-it-to-a-wary-house> for 2.4 million Americans unemployed for six months or more. President Obama has called on the GOP-led House to approve the bill, too. It has faced firm opposition in the House, although Republicans are facing increasing pressure to pass relief for the unemployed ahead of November's midterm elections. [*Reuters*<http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/07/us-usa-senate-unemployment-idUSBREA361YI20140407> ] .......................................................................................... *Pro-Russia separatists in eastern Ukraine declare independence* Pro-Russia separatists in eastern Ukraine declared independence from Kiev on Monday, and called on Russian President Vladimir Putin<http://theweek.com/article/index/258997/speedreads-putin-calls-obama-to-discuss-ukraine> to send in troops. Ukraine's acting prime minister, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, called the move, along with pro-Russia demonstrators' seizure of government buildings in three cities, part of a Russian bid to ignite "division and destruction" to justify invading. Ukraine said Tuesday it had retaken one of the buildings. [*The New York Times*<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/08/world/europe/russia-crimea-ukraine-unrest.html?hp> , *BBC News* <http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26934190>] .......................................................................................... *Justices won't help photographer accused of anti-gay discrimination* The Supreme Court on Monday turned down an appeal from a New Mexico photographer who refused to shoot pictures at a lesbian couple's wedding. The photographer, Elaine Huguenin, was charged with violating the state's anti-discrimination law after refusing to shoot the wedding because it would violate her religious beliefs. The high court's refusal to hear the appeal marked a significant victory for gay marriage advocates. [*Los Angeles Times*<http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-supreme-court-photographer-gays-20140404,0,126351.story> ] .......................................................................................... *Germany reaches a deal on returning art looted by Nazis* The German government announced a deal Monday that could lead to the return of works of art -- including some by Picasso, Chagall, and Gauguin -- that were wrongfully taken from Jewish owners. The agreement calls for a year of investigation to determine which of the works seized in 2012 from the apartment of Cornelius Gurlitton, the son of a Nazi-era art dealer, are of questionable provenance and therefore eligible for possible restitution. [*The New York Times*<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/08/arts/design/germany-announces-deal-on-art-looted-by-nazis.html?hp&_r=0> ] .......................................................................................... Obama Announces Grants to Schools to Integrate Work Experiences<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/08/us/politics/obama-announces-grants-to-schools-to-integrate-work-experiences.html?ref=us> WASHINGTON -- President Obama traveled to a high school in the Washington suburbs on Monday to announce the winners of $107 million in grants intended to update curriculums to better integrate work experiences and real-world learning opportunities. "We want to invest in your future," Mr. Obama told students at Bladensburg High School in Maryland, one of the winners. "Your potential for success is so high as long as you stay focused," he added. "As long as you're clear about your goals, you're going to succeed." .......................................................................................... Fearing Punishment for Bad Genes<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/08/science/fearing-punishment-for-bad-genes.html?ref=science> About 700,000 Americans have had their DNA sequenced, in full or in part, and the number is rising rapidly as costs plummet -- to $1,000 or less for a full genome, down from more than $1 million less than a decade ago. But many people are avoiding the tests because of a major omission in the 2008 federal law that bars employers and health insurers from seeking the results of genetic testing. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, known as GINA, does not apply to three types of insurance -- life, disability and long-term care -- that are especially important to people who may have serious inherited diseases. Sponsors of the act say that they were well aware of the omission, but that after a 14-year effort to write and pass the law, they had to settle for what they could get. That leaves many patients who may be at risk for inherited diseases fearful that a positive result could be used against them. *2016 Presidential News:* Kristol: 'No way' Jeb Bush is nominee<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/04/bill-kristol-jeb-bush-2016-elections-105470.html?hp=l1> Bill Kristol is willing to put money -- a lot of it -- on former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush not becoming the Republican presidential nominee in 2016. "I think there's no way there will be a Bush-Clinton race in 2016," the conservative commentator said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" on Tuesday. "I will buy all of you dinner. ... This could be expensive in New York, I guess. I'm willing to go out on a limb." Kristol said Republican primary voters will not choose someone in 2016 "who was last in office a decade ago," like the former Republican governor. "He's a good man; he hasn't been involved in any of the fights of the [President Barack] Obama years," Kristol said. "Republicans are kind of worked up about Obamacare, about the federal policy failures, that like someone who is either engaged in those fights in Washington or a governor who's governed successfully in real time. i.e., now, so a Scott Walker or a Mike Pence, or a Ted Cruz or a Marco Rubio or a Paul Ryan." .......................................................................................... Why immigration (probably) won't sink Marco Rubio in 2016<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/04/08/why-immigration-probably-wont-sink-marco-rubio-in-2016/> Yes, you read that right. Rubio, who helped spearhead a sweeping reform package and subsequently saw his stock fall with the conservative base. The Republican who put lots of energy behind a bill that has gone nowhere in the GOP-controlled House. The reason why immigration probably won't doom Rubio's chances has less to do with him than it does with the field of Republicans he'd likely face if he makes a White House bid. Most of the biggest-name prospects for 2016 are not in an ideal position to attack Rubio from the right on immigration because of their own positions. "Right now the only weakness that sticks out on Rubio if he runs is [the] immigration situation. By the time voters are through evaluating all the Republican candidates on the issue, he may not likely stick out as much because most of them will have to politically defend themselves on it," said veteran Republican strategist Ron Bonjean, who thinks the GOP should pursue immigration reform. .......................................................................................... Rand's Paul foreign policy views are not like the other potential 2016 candidates. Does it matter?<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/04/08/what-role-will-foreign-policy-play-in-the-2016-election-and-what-does-that-mean-for-rand-paul/> There are considerable challenges in breaking with the Republican Party on foreign policy, something Rand Paul is well aware of thanks to his family's history. Ron Paul is one of the most ideologically consistent politicians in the United States, and most of his policy ideas can end with, "because it would shrink government." On foreign policy, Ron Paul thinks the United States spends an inordinate amount. The best way to trim the budget is by stopping interventions and slashing foreign aid. While many of his fellow Republicans also advocate for a smaller government, the savings usually stop at America's shore. Paul Ryan's latest budget plan calls for extensive domestic savings, but a still-robust budget for the Pentagon. Over his three presidential campaigns, Paul's stubbornly libertarian foreign policy lens defined his campaign -- and his supporters. Although Paul always rounded up a merry band of young libertarians to support his campaigns, the major donors, strategists and pundits in the Republican Party never took him too seriously, although his strengths as a candidate became more notable each time he tried. The rest of the political establishment never took him very seriously either. Here's a graph of news coverage of the 2012 presidential con *Opinion:* Republicans are realizing that Jeb Bush is their only option in 2016<http://theweek.com/article/index/259530/republicans-are-realizing-that-jeb-bush-is-their-only-option-in-2016> What a difference a couple of months can make. Roughly a week into the first bona fide Jeb Bush presidential boomlet, the man who once flatly denied any intention of running has been remarkably busy. He teamed up with<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/04/jeb-bush-bobby-jindal-republicans-ad-105358.html> Louisiana Gov. (and presidential aspirant) Bobby Jindal on a video to promote a new project (NewRepublican.org) that will shape a positive message for the GOP going into the midterms and beyond. He attended a private dinner<http://www.cbsnews.com/news/2016-will-chris-christies-pain-be-jeb-bushs-gain/> with Republican mega-donor (and Israel superhawk) Sheldon Adelson in his airplane hangar. He did a sit-down interview<http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/04/07/jeb-bush-says-decision-on-2016-run-coming-before-year-end-says-illegal/> on *Fox News Sunday*. And he was at the center of a celebration of the 25th anniversary of his father's presidency, which featured a who's-who line-up of establishment Republicans openly urging<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/07/us/politics/jeb-bush-outlines-campaign-strategy-should-he-choose-to-run.html?hpw&rref=us&_r=0> the former Florida governor to run. All of this activity, meanwhile, is generating its own media buzz. In the past few days alone, George F. Will penned a column<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/george-f-will-the-gop-faithful-should-give-jeb-bush-a-hearing/2014/04/02/c29a66f2-b9be-11e3-96ae-f2c36d2b1245_story.html> urging Republicans to give Jeb a closer look, and the *Washington Post*'s Philip Rucker and Robert Costa reported<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/influential-republicans-working-to-draft-jeb-bush-into-2016-presidential-race/2014/03/29/11e33b06-b5f2-11e3-8cb6-284052554d74_story.html> that top Republicans are working to draft Jeb into the race. (One of their sources predicted that the "vast majority" of Mitt Romney's top 100 donors would fall in behind Jeb if he runs.) *DE News:* *Markell 'willing to discuss' softer pot penalties* Gov. Jack Markell, who signed legislation in 2011 legalizing marijuana for medical purposes before delaying the program's launch, is "willing to discuss" changes that would reduce penalties for the possession of small amounts of marijuana, according to a spokesman for the governor. Markell has said he would not support a move toward full legalization of the drug, like in Colorado in Washington, absent further studies about the consequences of legalization. "The Governor has supported making marijuana available for medical purposes and DHSS expects to license a dispensary that can open in Delaware this year," Markell spokesman Jonathon Dworkin said in a statement. "The Governor is willing to discuss changing the penalty for possession of small amounts of marijuana from jail sentences to just fines, but he would not support full legalization at this time without further studies and evidence of its consequences." More than two-thirds of Delawareans surveyed last month by Public Policy Pollingsupported the removal of criminal penalties for possessing an ounce or less of marijuana, making it punishable by a $100 fine and no jail time. Under current law, possession of marijuana is a Class B misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail and up to $1,150 in fines. The poll was commissioned by the Marijuana Policy Project, an advocacy group. Another pro-legalization group, Delaware NORML, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, organized lobbying efforts in Legislative Hall on Thursday, bringing advocates to meet with lawmakers. In last month's poll, support for reducing penalties for pot possession was found across party lines and age groups. Eighty percent of Democrats supported it; as did 51 percent of Republicans. Public Policy Polling surveyed 951 Delaware voters on March 18 and 19. The margin of error was 3.2 percent. More than 60 percent of Democrats polled supported regulating and taxing marijuana like alcohol. Republicans opposed the idea by a similar margin. Younger Delawareans were more likely to support the idea. "The era of criminalizing people for marijuana possession is over," Robert Capecchi, deputy director of state policies for the Marijuana Policy Project, said in a statement. "Nobody should face life-altering criminal penalties and time in jail simply for possessing a small amount of a substance that is less harmful than alcohol." -- Sam Losow *Finance Assistant* Beau Biden, DE Attorney General Office: (302) 295-8340 Cell: (202) 821-3399 sam@beaubiden.co
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhqJs93xsc+kslSo6yvTZbAIZvFA==