EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
FW: Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing for Tuesday, December 18, 2018
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
K
kchung@vpbiden.org
DATE:
2018-12-18 14:59:34
MSG_ID:
<badaa24f06db9f87fae0f4f1dc9461d7@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Valerie Biden Owens
<hurricane5155@gmail.com>
J
Jimmy Biden
<jbiden@lionhallgp.com>
J
Jill Tracy Biden
<jill.tracy2@gmail.com>
R
Hunter Biden
<rhbdc@icloud.com>
T
Ashley Blazer Biden
<trailblazerbiden@gmail.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing *From:* Bulletin Intelligence <Biden@BulletinIntelligence.com> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 18, 2018 7:55 AM *To:* Biden@BulletinIntelligence.com *Subject:* Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing for Tuesday, December 18, 2018 *Click to access <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=000-475&t=c> mobile-optimized online version, including download options and an audio reader.* [image: Image removed by sender. Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=001-432&t=c> *To: Vice President Joe Biden* *Tuesday, December 18, 2018 8:00 AM EST* Today's Table of Contents *Biden in the News* <#SECTION_1> • Iowa 2020 Poll: Biden Still Up Big Among Democrats, Despite Dip In Support. <#S1> • Sanders Holds Big Lead In Straw Poll Of Democracy For America Members. <#S2> • CNN’s Enten: Political Analysts May Be “Underestimating Biden’s Strength.” <#S3> • Biden: “I Think Anybody Can Beat” Trump In 2020. <#S4> • NYTimes’ Collins, Stephens Weigh In On A Possible Biden Bid. <#S5> • New Republic’s Shepard Says Biden’s Past Would Be Albatross In Democratic Race. <#S6> • Brad Bannon: Democrats Should Choose O’Rourke Or Harris As 2020 Nominee. <#S7> • Biden: Trump Administration “Has Wantonly Abdicated Our Leadership Role” In The Western Hemisphere. <#S8> *Leading the News* <#SECTION_2> • Reports Show Far-Reaching, Ongoing Russian Disinformation Efforts In US. <#S9> *Foreign Policy* <#SECTION_3> • US Diplomats Attend Taliban Peace Talks In UAE. <#S10> • US Airstrikes In Somalia Kill 62 Militants. <#S11> • CFR Assessment Cites Iran, Cybersecurity As Top Threats To US In 2019. <#S12> • White House: Trump Did Not Tell Erdogan He Would Extradite Gulen. <#S13> • May Postpones Parliamentary Vote On Brexit Deal Until Mid-January. <#S14> • Malaysia Files Criminal Charges Against Goldman Sachs Over 1MDB. <#S15> • US-South Korea Talks On Defense Payments Stall. <#S16> *Domestic Policy* <#SECTION_4> • Trump Takes Swipe At Democrats As Impasse Over Border Wall Continues. <#S17> • DHS Reportedly Barred House Members From Interviewing CBP Agents Involved In Girl’s Detention. <#S18> • Trump Criticizes Fed For “Even Considering” Rate Hikes. <#S19> • Trump Says He Would Work With Democrats On “Great” Healthcare Plan. <#S20> • DOJ Asks Circuit Court To Reverse Judge’s Trump Emoluments Ruling. <#S21> • Trump Announces Additional $4.9 Billion In Aid To Farmers. <#S22> • American Business Leaders Anxious Over USMCA’s Fate. <#S23> *Cancer Research* <#SECTION_5> • Precision Medicine Holds Promise In Cancer Treatment. <#S24> • Researchers Unsure In Wake Of NIH Fetal Tissue Procurement Ban. <#S25> *Editorials/Op-Eds* <#SECTION_6> • New York Times. <#S26> • Washington Post. <#S27> Biden in the News Iowa 2020 Poll: Biden Still Up Big Among Democrats, Despite Dip In Support. Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=002-f06&t=c> (12/17, Korecki) reported that a Focus on Rural America poll of 500 potential Democratic Iowa caucus-goers, taken Dec. 10-11, shows former Vice President Joe Biden leading a hypothetical field of 2020 Democratic presidential hopefuls with 30%, followed by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) at 13%, Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-TX) at 11%, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) at 10%, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) at 9%, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) at 7%, Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) at 6%, and other possible contenders lagging further behind. Politico said that Biden and Warren “saw seven-point drops in their performance since the poll was last in the field in September.” Neither Klobuchar nor O’Rourke were included in the previous poll. Politico added, “The apparent rise of Klobuchar and O’Rourke – along with signs of a Biden and Warren fade – suggests that Iowa Democrats are making way for new faces in what’s expected to be the largest and most diverse field in decades.” *Media Analyses: Polls Show Biden Frontrunner In Iowa. *ON its website, CBS News <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=003-205&t=c> (12/17, Watson) reported, “With the Iowa caucuses just over a year away, Democratic caucusgoers are most likely to say former Vice President Joe Biden is their pick for 2020.” CBS News highlighted the Des Moines Register/CNN/Mediacom poll <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=004-dc8&t=c> – covered in yesterday’s briefing – that showed Biden leading a hypothetical field of 2020 Democratic hopefuls with 32%. CBS News added, “An earlier CNN poll in October of Democratic voters nationwide also landed Biden on top. Not only does Biden generate the most support among Democrats in Iowa – previous polls suggest the public thinks he has the best shot at defeating President Trump. ... [A] July Politico/Morning Consult poll showed Biden beating Mr. Trump 46 percent to 35 percent in a hypothetical 2020 match-up.” Similarly, Inside Sources <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=005-a92&t=c> (12/17, Graham) reported, “First Politico, then SRSS and now a new CNN/Des Moines Register poll of likely Iowa caucus-goers confirms that, in the early going, the top names in the Democratic field are Biden, Bernie and–surprise!–Beto.” The new CNN/Des Moines Register showed Biden leading “the pack with 32 percent support, followed by Sen. Bernie Sanders at 19 percent and Rep. Beto O’Rourke at 11 percent. They were the only people in double-digits.” Sanders Holds Big Lead In Straw Poll Of Democracy For America Members. Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=006-291&t=c> (12/18, Siders) reports that Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) “tops the first 2020 straw poll by the progressive political action committee Democracy for America by a wide margin.” Sanders leads with 36%, followed by former Vice President Joe Biden at 15%, Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-TX) at 12%, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) at 8%, and Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) at 7%; no other potential candidate topped 4%. DFA Executive Director Charles Chamberlain, who will become chairman of the organization next month, “said support for Biden likely draws in part from nostalgia for the Obama administration and that, among progressive Democrats, ‘I have a feeling the wheels come off the cart when he starts to campaign.’” Politico adds, “DFA said members cast more than 94,000 votes, ranking up to three potential candidates on each ballot. The poll ran Nov. 29 through Dec. 14, and results reflect only first-choice votes.” CNN’s Enten: Political Analysts May Be “Underestimating Biden’s Strength.” In an online “analysis” for CNN <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=007-59b&t=c> (12/17), Harry Enten said that as former Vice President Biden mulls a White House bid, “few seem to think he’s the frontrunner for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination,” because of “his record (fairly mainstream in a party moving to the left), his age (he’s 76) and the fact that he’s a white male in a diversifying party. But maybe – just maybe – we’re underestimating Biden’s strength.” Enten went on to highlight “some key points working in Biden’s favor,” writing that the former Vice President “hasn’t trailed in a single national poll conducted in the last 11 months”; polls show that “he’s well-liked”; and surveys also indicate “he can beat President Donald Trump.” Enten added that “there’s enough data out there that would make me think that perhaps I should run if I were Biden.” Biden: “I Think Anybody Can Beat” Trump In 2020. The Intercept <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=008-2f9&t=c> (12/17, Ballasy) reports that former Vice President Joe Biden thinks “that ‘anybody can beat’ President Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election.” The article said that during a recent stop on his book tour, Biden asserted, “I think I’m the most qualified person in the country to be president.” Following “an address at the Lantos Foundation’s 10th anniversary gala, where he was recognized with a legacy award, Biden was asked specifically by The Intercept why he thinks he’s the most qualified person to take on Trump. ‘You don’t run for president unless you think you are qualified,’ Biden replied.” Asked, “Why do you think you could beat President Trump? Why is this your time?” Biden replied, “I think anybody can beat him.” Newsweek <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=009-7a1&t=c> (12/17, Marcin) highlighted The Intercept report. NYTimes’ Collins, Stephens Weigh In On A Possible Biden Bid. The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=00a-4ae&t=c> (12/18, Collins, Stephens) runs a piece, in which columnists Gail Collins and Bret Stephens discuss politics. Stephens asked Collins “how do you feel about Joe Biden?” Collins replied, “Everybody talks about his age, which isn’t an overwhelming concern if you presume he’ll pick a very capable running mate. But the big worry, as our colleague Frank Bruni has pointed out, is that this is a guy who’s run for president before. A lot. And pretty much disastrously.” Asked if he had “a Democratic favorite,” Stephens replied, “Er, Biden. ... Every other contender would need at least a year of on-the-job training, which is something the country and the world will scarcely be able to afford after four years of Trumpism.” Stephens adds, “I see Biden as the Democratic answer to George H.W. Bush – a statesmanlike presence who could work with the opposition without rancor and leave the office and country better than he found it.” New Republic’s Shepard Says Biden’s Past Would Be Albatross In Democratic Race. In a negative piece for The New Republic <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=00b-3d5&t=c> (12/18), Alex Shephard says that while former Vice President Joe Biden “is the early frontrunner” in the 2020 Democratic presidential race, if he enters the contest, “his past will be raked over – and his political record looks increasingly checkered in today’s light.” Shephard says, for instance, that Biden “shamefully failed to protect Anita Hill after she accused Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment in 1991”; he “is notoriously cosy with financial interests”; he “supported the Iraq War and the 1994 crime bill”; he “went to great efforts to suppress busing and other school integration efforts and was against reproductive rights before he was in favor of them.” Shephard adds that in the Democratic primary, “Biden’s obvious centrism and voting record will be liabilities that his off-the-cuff style may make worse – it’s easy to imagine the punchy, impulsive Biden doubling down when he should be recanting.” Brad Bannon: Democrats Should Choose O’Rourke Or Harris As 2020 Nominee. In an op-ed for the Daily Caller <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=00c-e64&t=c> (12/17), Democratic pollster Brad Bannon said that during the 2020 race for the White House, there will be a fight “between the [Hillary] Clinton and [Sen. Bernie] Sanders factions within the Democratic Party. Should the party nominate a populist progressive like Bernie Sanders or a centrist like Joe Biden? Establishment Democrats dismiss Sanders as a fake Democrat who is too liberal to woo moderate voters. Berniecrats believe that a Biden nomination would be a rerun of the 2016 defeat of a status quo politician who has no appeal to voters starved for change. The answer is the party needs to find a candidate who appeals to both camps.” Bannon added that because “neither Sanders nor Biden are acceptable to both factions, the best bet would be to nominate one of the other potential candidates such as Beto O’Rourke of Texas or Sen. Kamala Harris of California.” Biden: Trump Administration “Has Wantonly Abdicated Our Leadership Role” In The Western Hemisphere. In an op-ed for Americas Quarterly <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=00d-2d2&t=c> (12/17), former Vice President Joe Biden touts the work he and former President Barack Obama did in “leading US engagement with our partners throughout the Western Hemisphere,” saying that when they were able to create “a new foundation of cooperation for our region built around shared responsibility, respect and partnership.” Biden criticizes the Trump Administration, saying “that foundation for cooperation has been needlessly yet determinedly destroyed,” as “this administration has wantonly abdicated our leadership in the region.” Biden adds, “It is vital that we maintain our leadership role in the region – not because we fear competition, but because US leadership is indispensable to addressing the persistent challenges that prevent our region from realizing its fullest potential.” Leading the News Reports Show Far-Reaching, Ongoing Russian Disinformation Efforts In US. Two independent reports released by the Senate Intelligence Committee on Monday conclude that Russian disinformation efforts surrounding the 2016 US presidential election were far more ambitious than previously thought, and that such efforts continue to this day. ABC World News Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=00e-5f2&t=c> (12/17, story 8, 0:25, Muir) called it “the most sweeping analysis yet of Russia’s meddling on social media.” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=00f-b76&t=c> (12/17, Jalonick) says the reports, compiled by cybersecurity firm New Knowledge <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=010-725&t=c> and by a joint project <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=011-619&t=c> of Oxford University and social media analysis firm Graphika, conclude that “Russia’s sweeping political disinformation campaign on U.S. social media was more far-reaching than originally thought, with troll farms working to discourage black voters and ‘blur the lines between reality and fiction’ to help elect” President Trump in 2016. The reports, released Monday by the Senate Intelligence Committee, also conclude that “troll farms are still working to stoke racial and political passions” in the US. The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=012-856&t=c> (12/17, Shane, Frenkel) reports the new information “adds new details to the portrait that has emerged over the last two years of the energy and imagination of the Russian effort to sway American opinion and divide the country, which the authors said continues to this day. ... Both reports stress” that Russia’s Internet Research Agency “created social media accounts under fake names on virtually every available platform,” including Facebook, Google+, Instagram, Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, and YouTube. A “major goal was to support” Trump in both his primary and general election campaigns, and as President. Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=013-17f&t=c> (12/17, Lima) reports, “In total, Russian operations included over 10 million tweets, over 1,000 YouTube videos, roughly 116,000 Instagram posts and more than 60,000 unique Facebook posts.” The Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=014-74f&t=c> (12/17, Volz) reports that the effort was notably successful on Instagram, where there were 187 million interactions with deceptive content on Instagram compared with 76.5 million on Facebook, according to New Knowledge. The Los Angeles Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=015-fc2&t=c> (12/17, Halper) reports, “More than 30 million Facebook and Instagram users shared propaganda messages generated as part of [the] campaign...to polarize and misinform voters.” New Knowledge said many specifically targeted African-Americans, writing in its report, “The IRA exploited the trust of their page audiences to develop human assets, at least some of whom were not aware of the role they played. The tactic was substantially more pronounced on Black-targeted accounts.” The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=016-faf&t=c> (12/17, Frenkel, Wakabayashi, Conger) says the reports also detailed “tech companies’ foot-dragging” on providing information about Russian efforts. YouTube “did not disclose [to lawmakers] how many people watched the videos on its site that were created by Russian trolls,” Facebook “did not release the comments that its users made when they viewed Russian-generated content,” and Twitter “gave only scattered details about the Russian-controlled accounts that spread propaganda there.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=017-98e&t=c> (12/17, Dwoskin) reports “Russia’s disinformation teams [also] trained their sights” on Special Counsel Robert Mueller soon after his appointment. They “unloaded on Mueller through fake accounts on Facebook, Twitter and beyond, falsely claiming that the former FBI director was corrupt and that the allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 election were crackpot conspiracies.” The Post writes, “Having worked to help get Trump into the White House, they now worked to neutralize the biggest threat to his staying there.” Renée DiResta of New Knowledge writes in the New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=018-6f1&t=c> (12/17), “Regardless of what any tech executives may have said, the data indicate that this was not a small-scale problem fixable by tweaking a platform’s advertising purchase policy. Rather, it was a cross-platform attack that made use of numerous features on each social network and that spanned the entire social ecosystem. ... The biggest lesson from the Senate committee’s request for our investigation of Russian interference is the troubling absence of adequate structures for collaboration among multiple stakeholders, private and public alike, to establish solutions and appropriate oversight.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=019-dc6&t=c> (12/17) says in an editorial that the “Russia operation is staggering in its scale, precision and deceptiveness. ... Republicans have protested over the past year that election interference is neither unusual nor important. This week’s reports comprehensively put both arguments to rest. Russia waged an unprecedented campaign, targeting Americans across all segments of society, on platforms large and small.” Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) said on CNN’s Situation Room[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=01a-75e&t=c> (12/17), “The length and breadth and the reach of the Russia interference as disclosed by the Senate Intelligence Committee’s work is really striking. It just goes to show they’ve been at it a long time, and who benefited from this? It was the Trump campaign, and they had every intention of making sure that Trump would become the president.” Several Democratic House members weighed in on Twitter. Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO) tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=01b-2ed&t=c>, “More evidence of the lengths Russia went to in order to get Donald Trump elected president. Now we have to ask ourselves: Why did they choose Trump? What will the GOP do to help stem the significant election interference?” Rep. Susanne DelBene (D-WA) tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=01c-05f&t=c>, “The more we learn, the worse it gets. Not only did Russia try to help Trump win the election, they tried to suppress the votes of African-Americans. We must let Mueller finish his work and protect our democracy.” Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=01d-fe7&t=c>, “This Senate report confirms Russian officials manipulated millions of social media users by exploiting political and racial divisions in American society. We’ve got questions. When Dems take back the House in January, we’ll get answers.” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=01e-5e7&t=c>, “Russian efforts to manipulate Americans through social media are sophisticated, cynical, effective and very much ongoing. Russia seeks to divide us among racial, ethnic and political fault lines.” Rep. Nydia Velazquez (D-NY) tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=01f-38b&t=c>, “It becomes chillingly clearer every single day how relentless Russia was in attempting to influence our elections & assist @realdonaldtrump. This is why I called for a Special Counsel in December 2016 – and why Mueller’s investigation must be protected!” *Lawsuit Seeks To Expose Whether Russia Also Aided US Environmentalists. *The Daily Caller <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=020-b3e&t=c> (12/17, Hopkins) reports that the Institute for Energy Research, “a free-market energy group,” has filed an open records lawsuit against the State Department “to uncover whether Russian entities attempted to financially support US environmentalist causes.” The lawsuit “follows mounting questions over Russian support of environmentalist groups that have opposed US fracking.” *Haley: Russia Has Made It “Very Hard” To Have A Relationship. *Ambassador Haley said on Fox News’ Hannity[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=021-527&t=c> (12/17), “We want a relationship with Russia. It’s in our interest to try and have communication and relationship with Russia. They have made that very hard. ... Someone asked me, ‘Is Russia a friend or a foe?’ My answer was, ‘It depends on the day.’ Our goal is to hopefully have them be a friend more days than they are a foe, but, it’s not going to be because we are being soft on them, it’s going to be because they want the relationship back and they are starting to act better.” *Isikoff Now Expresses Doubts About Steele Dossier. *The Daily Caller <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=022-be8&t=c> (12/17, Ross) reports journalist Michael Isikoff, “who was first to report allegations from the Steele dossier, said in a new interview that many of the salacious allegations in the document are ‘likely false.’” Asked <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=023-7fc&t=c> by Mediaite columnist John Ziegler, “Would you agree that a lot of what’s in the Steele dossier has been somewhat vindicated?” Isikoff replied, “No.” *Ex-Federal Prosecutor: Statute Of Limitations Could Protect Trump. *Under the headline “How Trump Could Get Away With It,” former federal prosecutor Lawrence Robbins writes in Politico Magazine <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=024-1bc&t=c> (12/17, Robbins) that “the statute of limitations on the campaign finance felonies” committed by Michael Cohen, “as well as virtually any other felony with which President Trump might be charged, is five years, beginning with when the offenses were committed. Especially if Trump were reelected in 2020, he would still be a sitting president when those five years are up. ... In an ordinary case, a prosecutor might ask the target of a prosecution” not to “invoke a statute-of-limitations defense,” but Trump has no incentive to do so. *Hewitt: Trump Could “Come To Relish The Battle” Of Impeachment. *Hugh Hewitt writes in his Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=025-647&t=c> (12/17) column that if Trump is impeached, it is “extremely unlikely” that he would be convicted and removed from office because at least 20 Senate Republicans would have to vote to convict along with every Democrat. But impeachment “will be a ratings bonanza. Who likes ratings bonanzas? Who can command the media – or any particular outlet – and appear on 10 minutes notice? Who, in short, might learn to love ‘the process?’ Trump, of course.” He “can look at his markers already down on the table and actually come to relish the battle.” *House Democrats Compete To Lead Upcoming Trump Probes. *Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=026-29d&t=c> (12/17, Hosenball, Morgan) reports that as they prepare to take control of the House, “Democrats are jockeying to lead overlapping investigations into President Donald Trump in a scramble that could cause headaches for Nancy Pelosi, who is expected to be House speaker.” The investigations “will be led by as many as six different House committees with some falling under the possible jurisdiction of two or more,” according to “Democratic congressional sources.” *Mueller Releases Memo Detailing Flynn’s FBI Interview. *The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=027-929&t=c> (12/17, Mordock) reports Mueller “on Monday released a heavily-redacted memo <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=028-dc4&t=c> detailing former national security adviser Michael Flynn’s interview with FBI agents in which Flynn repeatedly lied about his contacts with then-Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak.” The January 2017 memo “describes FBI agents’ conversation with Flynn about his contacts with Mr. Kislyak.” Flynn pleaded guilty last year to lying to FBI agents about his contacts with Kislyak. *Two Former Flynn Associates Indicted Over Turkey Lobbying. *The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=029-b85&t=c> (12/17, Goldman, Mazzetti) reports “two former business associates” of Flynn’s “have been indicted as part of a federal investigation into Turkey’s secret 2016 lobbying campaign to pressure the United States to expel a rival of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.” Charges against Bijan Kian and Ekim Alptekin were unsealed on Monday. The two men “were indicted last week as part of a conspiracy to violate federal lobbying rules, and Mr. Alptekin was also charged with making false statements to F.B.I. investigators.” USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=02a-177&t=c> (12/17, Johnson) reports, “The case, which alleges that Rafiekian and Alptekin sought to conceal the Turkish government’s role in the effort to extradite Fethullah Gulen, was brought by federal prosecutors in Virginia,” not Mueller. The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=02b-5f8&t=c> (12/17, Zapotosky) reports, “The indictment demonstrates the extent to which Flynn was secretly working to advance the interests of his Turkish clients while publicly serving as a key surrogate to Donald Trump and auditioning for a role in his administration.” However, The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=02c-df7&t=c> (12/17, Chalfant) reports, “Flynn is not identified by name in the filing. Instead, he is referred to as ‘Person A,’ an individual with whom Kian founded ‘Company A’ – the Flynn Intel Group.” The Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=02d-670&t=c> (12/17, Viswanatha, Nissenbaum) reports the indictment also did not name Turkish Treasury Minister Berat Albayrak or Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu, but specifics in the documents make it possible to identify them. Pierre Thomas reported on ABC World News Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=02e-738&t=c> (12/17, story 9, 1:30, Muir), “President Trump has portrayed Flynn as victim, even though he fired Flynn himself for lying. ... Two of Flynn’s associates have been charged with illegally working as foreign agents for Turkey. They could face up to 15 years in prison if convicted.” Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=02f-6aa&t=c> (12/17, Layne) and the New York Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=030-b3a&t=c> (12/17, Brown) also have reports. *Comey Slams Trump As Liar Following Congressional Testimony. *The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=031-02e&t=c> (12/17, Demirjian) reports ex-FBI Director James Comey, appearing before the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform committees, “accused President Trump on Monday of trying ‘to burn down the entire FBI’ and charged that congressional Republicans were willing accomplices for failing to challenge him.” Following a closed-door session that lasted nearly six hours, Comey told reporters, “The FBI’s reputation has taken a big hit because the President with his acolytes has lied about it constantly.” Kristen Welker reported on NBC Nightly News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=032-eba&t=c> (12/17, story 5, 2:15, Holt), “Comey speaking out about the 2016 campaign, also taking aim at Republicans who he says failed to stand up to the President.” Comey: “Republicans used to understand that the actions of a President matter, the words of a President matter, the rule of law matters and the truth matters. Where are those Republicans today? To their everlasting shame, I hope they overcome that and realize someday they have to explain to their grandchildren what they did today.” Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=033-df8&t=c> (12/17, Morin) says Comey “ripped into Republicans” after the session, and on CNN’s Situation Room[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=034-214&t=c> (12/17), Wolf Blitzer called Comey’s comments a “stinging rebuke” of the President and congressional Republicans. The New York Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=035-a90&t=c> (12/17, Fredericks) says Comey “came out swinging” after the session, calling Trump “a liar and slamming Republicans for being too afraid to stand up to him.” Comey said, “So another day of [questions about] Hillary Clinton’s emails and the Steele dossier. This while the President of the United States is lying about the FBI, attacking the FBI, and attacking the rule of law in this country. How does that make any sense at all?” White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders later tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=036-45b&t=c>, “Republicans should stand up to Comey and his tremendous corruption – from the fake Hillary Clinton investigation, to lying and leaking, to FISA abuse, and a list too long to name. The President did the country a service by firing him and exposing him for the shameless fraud he is.” Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) said on CNN’s Situation Room[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=037-4b2&t=c> (12/17) that Comey’s comments were “not a surprise. I mean, here’s a gentleman who has dedicated his life to the rule of law as the director of the FBI, who takes a lot of pride in the work that the professionals at the department do. And I think, frankly, he’s sick and tired of the President’s efforts to undermine the rule of law, to attack the good men and women at the FBI, to call into question the motivations of those that are doing the work at the office of the Special Counsel.” Justice reporter Laura Jarrett said on CNN’s Situation Room[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=038-481&t=c> (12/17), “On the one hand, it strikes me as deeply personal. The President attacks James Comey relentlessly, besmirches his character, called for him to be investigated, jailed. So I think Comey takes his moments to punch back a little bit. ... But he is also, I think, genuinely offended by the deafening silence by Republicans on Capitol Hill every time the President politicizes the Justice Department and the FBI.” But on Fox News’ Special Report[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=039-577&t=c> (12/17), Catherine Herridge said Comey “took none of the blame for any damage to the Bureau’s credibility.” Monica Crowley said on Fox News’ Hannity[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=03a-b13&t=c> (12/17) that Comey “is a master of projection. He is so good at accusing President Trump and Republicans of exactly what he himself and his cohorts are guilty of: lawbreaking, lying, corruption, being uninterested in the truth.” The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=03b-001&t=c> (12/17, Beavers) reports, “When asked what he thought about Trump calling his former personal lawyer Michael Cohen, who is now cooperating with federal investigators, a ‘rat,’ Comey responded it ‘undermines the rule of law.’” He continued, “This is the President of the United States calling a witness who is cooperating with his own Justice Department a ‘rat.’” Trump’s calling Cohen a “rat” over the weekend was also addressed on Monday morning cable shows. On CNN’s New Day[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=03c-333&t=c> (12/17), Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) said, “The President is clearly going after the rule of law and our criminal justice system, and he’s undermining it. For the millions of people who follow closely what President Trump has to say on Twitter every day, the idea that the FBI broke into his attorney’s office runs right up against the foundation of our law, which is the FBI was executing a duly authorized warrant.” Former New Jersey Assistant Attorney General Elie Honig said on CNN’s New Day[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=03d-fa2&t=c> (12/17, 6:03 a.m. ET), “This is the language that mob bosses use. … We have done trials where people have been murdered because somebody said, ‘That guy is a rat.’” John Berman said on CNN’s New Day[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=03e-53c&t=c> (12/17, 6:00 a.m. ET), “His White House, his campaign, his Presidential transition and inauguration and charity, and, yes, his personal life. What is the President doing about all this? As zero lawyers would advise, he’s rage tweeting. He calls his former attorney Michael Cohen a ‘rat.’” *WTimes Analysis: Trump’s Relationship With CIA Has Improved. *The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=03f-310&t=c> (12/17, Scarborough) reports that following earlier tensions, the President and the CIA have achieved “a more workmanlike relationship. ... Loyalists say the president has come to appreciate the daily flow of insights on, for example, North Korea and Iran, even if he doesn’t like everything he hears,” and “credit key players” such as Secretary of State Pompeo and National Security Adviser Bolton. *Stone Must Publicly Apologize To Chinese Businessman As Part Of Settlement. *The Washington Examiner <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=040-1ba&t=c> (12/17, Correll) reports, “Longtime Trump associate Roger Stone must place ads in national newspapers expressing regret over defamatory statements he previously made on InfoWars” about Chinese businessman Guo Wengui “as part of a settlement for a defamation lawsuit Monday.” In order to avoid paying “any of the $100 million in damages the defamation suit was seeking, Stone must run ads in papers, including the Wall Street Journal, apologizing for the inaccurate statements. There will also be a retraction of the statements on social media.” *Witchcraft Practitioners Upset By Trump’s Use Of Term “Witch Hunt.” *The New York Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=041-123&t=c> (12/17, Brown) reports, “Witchcraft practitioners are fuming over President Trump’s repeated use of the phrase ‘witch hunt’ to describe” Mueller’s investigation. Practitioners raised their concerns with the Daily Beast, with one saying, “It is particularly horrifying because many modern practitioners of witchcraft devote their lives to seeking compassion and justice.” Foreign Policy US Diplomats Attend Taliban Peace Talks In UAE. The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=042-896&t=c> (12/17, Mashal) reports that representatives from the US, the Taliban, “and several Asian countries gathered in the United Arab Emirates on Monday for what officials cautiously described as important meetings that could lead to formal talks to end the 17-year war in Afghanistan.” In a statement Sunday, the Taliban “said...that they would meet representatives of the United States as well as Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates” – three “American allies that have varying levels of influence over the Taliban, have been at the center of a Trump administration push to help shape the peace process.” Yet, the Times says that the “optimism fostered by months of urgent American diplomacy was dampened by the Taliban’s apparent refusal to meet with a delegation of the Afghan government.” Still, “Afghan officials said late Monday that they had not given up hope that the two sides would talk.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=043-93d&t=c> (12/17, Salahuddin) reports that while there was “no official confirmation” from Afghan President Ashraf Ghani’s government “of whether any government official participated in the meeting,” Ghani’s “national security adviser, Hamdullah Mohib, said in a tweet that he met Sunday in the UAE with officials from the three countries and the United States.” Meanwhile, spokesman for the US Embassy in Kabul “described the meeting as ‘part of efforts by the United States and other international partners to promote an intra-Afghan dialogue aimed at ending the conflict in Afghanistan.’” Ahead of the talks in the UAE, “officials said Zalmay Khalilzad, the new U.S. envoy for Afghanistan, would lead the meeting.” Khalilzad “recently suggested the formation of an interim government instead of holding a presidential election as scheduled in April,” but “members of Ghani’s administration have rejected the idea, insisting on going ahead with the election despite widely mismanaged parliamentary polls in October that took place after more than three years of delay.” US Airstrikes In Somalia Kill 62 Militants. Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=044-6e9&t=c> (12/17, Uwiringiyimana) reports the US military said Monday that it “had killed 62 militants in six air strikes over the weekend” in Somalia’s Banaadir province. Africa Command (Africom) said four strikes were carried out on Saturday, “killing 34 militants, and two more on Sunday, which killed 28.” In a statement, it said, “Africa Command and our Somali partners conducted these air strikes to prevent terrorists from using remote areas as a safe haven to plot, direct, inspire and recruit for future attacks.” To the Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=045-df5&t=c> (12/17, Wolfgang), the “massive aerial assault on al-Shabab enclaves in Somalia over the weekend...signaled that the Trump administration could take an even more aggressive tack in 2019. But the unexpectedly broad mission also has analysts warning that Somalia’s feeble central government has allowed the al Qaeda affiliate in Somalia to ‘claw back’ to relevance and is now in a position where it can be contained but not defeated.” CFR Assessment Cites Iran, Cybersecurity As Top Threats To US In 2019. The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=046-9ba&t=c> (12/17, Muñoz) reports that “high-profile cyber attacks on US military and civilian infrastructure networks and a possible proxy war with Iran top the list of possible national security threats facing the US in the coming year, according to a new survey of foreign policy and national security analysts.” The assessment, released Monday by the Council on Foreign Relations, said there was a “moderate” chance of “one of the two threats occurring in the coming year, but noted that either would have a severe impact on US interests across the globe.” White House: Trump Did Not Tell Erdogan He Would Extradite Gulen. Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=047-0dd&t=c> (12/17, Mason) reports the White House said Monday that President Trump “did not commit during a meeting with Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan at the G20 summit two weeks ago to extradite a Muslim cleric based in the United States.” A “senior White House official” said, “While meeting with President Erdogan at the G20, the president did not commit to extradite Fethullah Gulen.” The official was responding comments Sunday by Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu, who said Trump told Erdogan at the G20 in Buenos Aires that the US “was working on extraditing Gulen and other people.” May Postpones Parliamentary Vote On Brexit Deal Until Mid-January. The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=048-37b&t=c> (12/17, Adam) reports, “After a failed bid to secure further concessions from European leaders on Brexit, Prime Minister Theresa May returned to Parliament on Monday with little to offer beyond a new date for a vote on the deal outlining how Britain will withdraw from the European Union.” She “said parliamentary debate on the deal would resume Jan. 7, with a vote held the following week.” In an online video provided by the AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=049-f2c&t=c> (12/17), May stressed to lawmakers, “Let us not break faith with the British people by trying to stage another referendum.” Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=04a-3ba&t=c> (12/16, Maclellan, Piper) reports May also pledged “to get assurances from the European Union before then to break a deadlock over Britain’s fraught efforts to quit the bloc.” With the March 29 departure deadline drawing near, however, “a mid-January vote could force lawmakers to make a decision between her deal or leaving without one, a nightmare scenario for many businesses.” As such, “May faced accusations from some lawmakers that she was trying to force a deeply divided parliament into backing her deal by running the clock down to exit day.” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=04b-bc8&t=c> (12/17, Lawless, Kirka) says opposition legislators, including Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn and “many from May’s Conservative Party,” remain “opposed to the deal, and accused May of deliberately wasting time by delaying the vote for several more weeks.” Corbyn also “said he would submit a motion of no-confidence in the prime minister over her delays.” Even as May “insisted she could salvage her unpopular divorce deal,” the AP says, “pressure was mounting for dramatic action – a new referendum or a vote among lawmakers – to find a way out of Britain’s Brexit impasse and prevent the economic damage of a messy exit from the EU on March 29 with no agreement in place.” A New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=04c-e4b&t=c> (12/17, Castle) analysis assesses whether a second Brexit referendum is possible or advisable. Malaysia Files Criminal Charges Against Goldman Sachs Over 1MDB. Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=04d-9b7&t=c> (12/17, Dilts, Ananthalakshmi) reports, “Malaysia on Monday filed criminal charges against Goldman Sachs Group Inc related to its dealings with the sovereign wealth fund 1MDB,” and Goldman responded that “the previous Malaysian government had lied to the investment bank.” Malaysian Attorney General Tommy Thomas said in a statement that Malaysia “will seek jail terms as well as billions in fines from Goldman Sachs and four other individuals who allegedly diverted about $2.7 billion” from 1MDB. Goldman spokesman Michael DuVally said in a statement, “Certain members of the former Malaysian government and 1MDB lied to Goldman Sachs, outside counsel and others about the use of proceeds from these transactions.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=04e-b95&t=c> (12/17, Merle) reports, “According to Malaysian and US authorities, Goldman secured the work with the help of bribes arranged by two former employees and others. Goldman made about $600 million in fees from the deals, ‘which was several times higher than the prevailing market rates and industry norms,’ Thomas said in a statement.” The Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=04f-081&t=c> (12/17, Wright) reports Thomas also filed charges against Jho Low and Jasmine Loo, who have been charged in absentia by Malaysian authorities with money laundering and other offenses. US-South Korea Talks On Defense Payments Stall. The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=050-68d&t=c> (12/17, Muñoz) reports talks between US and South Korean officials “over President Trump’s demands that Seoul...pay more for US military operations on the Korean peninsula have stalled.” Despite several “rounds of bilateral talks going back to March, American and South Korean negotiators fell short of a final deal over how much the key US ally in the Pacific should subsidize costs tied to the American military mission in Korea.” US Forces-Korea officials “urged a ‘swift conclusion’ and an agreement between Washington and Seoul on the issue,” and have “warned that continued delays in such talks would lead to a ‘possible lapse in contributions’ from the South Korean military.” Domestic Policy Trump Takes Swipe At Democrats As Impasse Over Border Wall Continues. With the Dec. 21 deadline to fund the government looming, the President and congressional Democrats remain at an impasse over funding for the President’s border wall. Media reports indicate there is no indication that a deal is in sight, and several say congressional Republicans are awaiting word from the President on how to proceed. As negotiations continued Monday, the Daily Caller <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=051-0b3&t=c> (12/17) reports, Trump “took a swipe at Democratic lawmakers” with a tweet <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=052-7b2&t=c> that said, “Anytime you hear a Democrat saying that you can have good Border Security without a Wall, write them off as just another politician following the party line. Time for us to save billions of dollars a year and have, at the same time, far greater safety and control!” USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=053-030&t=c> (12/17, Cummings) reports that the tweet originally contained a typo. Trump “deleted the tweet and posted a new one with the correct spelling at about 11 a.m.” The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=054-12c&t=c> (12/17, Burke) says Trump’s tweet came “days before a Dec. 21 deadline for funding the government.” Weijia Jiang said in the lead story for the CBS Evening News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=055-7ed&t=c> (12/17, lead story, 2:15, Glor) that while “both Congressional and White House officials tell CBS News there will be a compromise...even Republicans say the way forward is murky.” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=056-176&t=c> (12/18, Yen) says there were “few signs of progress” on Monday, and Bloomberg News <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=057-0ad&t=c> (12/17, Sink, Wasson) reported late Monday morning that the President “isn’t inclined to support a one- or two-week stopgap spending measure that would avert a partial government shutdown over the holidays, according to a person familiar with White House planning.” Kristen Welker said on NBC’s Today[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=058-0cb&t=c> (12/17), “The chances for a partial shutdown...seem to be increasing by the day, with no plan in sight for a deal.” Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=059-736&t=c> (12/17, Everett, Bresnahan, Ferris) reports Senate Republicans are searching for a way to avoid a shutdown “but they are waiting for President Donald Trump to weigh in before making a move.” Terry Moran reported on ABC World News Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=05a-37a&t=c> (12/17, story 3, 1:10, Muir) that Congress “is looking to the White House to see if President Trump really will shut down government if he doesn’t get money for his border wall.” However, CNN chief political correspondent Dana Bash said on CNN’s Situation Room[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=05b-c44&t=c> (12/17) that Republicans “have gotten no word from the President on how he wants to proceed,” and Kasie Hunt said on MSNBC’s Morning Joe[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=05c-b33&t=c> (12/17, 7:03 a.m. ET) that “congressional Republicans are looking down Pennsylvania Avenue and thinking, ‘What is this guy doing?’ They all want to leave town for Christmas. They could easily agree and pass a spending bill.” Michelle Cottle, a member of the New York Times editorial board, writes in the New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=05d-29c&t=c> (12/17, Cottle), “Lest anyone have any doubts, if a shutdown does come to pass at midnight on Friday, when parts of the government are set to run out of funding, this president will own it 110 percent.” Charles Lane of the Washington Post said on Fox News’ Special Report[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=05e-5f5&t=c> (12/17), “I think the President threw his own team, his own fellow Republicans kind of a curve when he said I will be proud to shutdown the government over this. I think a lot of them on the Hill are like, ‘Wait. What do you mean? We are trying to avoid the blame for this.’ Ever since then he hasn’t been able to organize a response. I think people on the Hill are a little nervous that their leader in the White House doesn’t quite understand their predicament, doesn’t quits understand the politics of this. On the other hand, I do think what the President understands is the politics of the Republican base which does appreciate seeing him fight tooth and nail for what he promised to do in the campaign.” Fox News chief White House correspondent John Roberts said on Fox News’ Special Report[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=05f-e20&t=c> (12/17), “It is beginning to look like the White House’s hard line on a border wall may not be so hard after all. Out there already is a proposal for a continuing resolution that would keep the government funded through the end of fiscal year 2019...that would provide $1.6 billion for about 65 miles of border fence through the Rio Grande section of the southern border.” Democrats “have indicated that they may be able to support such a proposal in the House. There is an increasing sentiment among many Republicans that they would rather go for a continuing resolution than shutdown the government over Christmas.” However, Hallie Jackson said on NBC Nightly News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=060-649&t=c> (12/17, story 2, 1:20, Holt) that “there is plenty of talk about a potential deal but nothing firm yet.” CNN politics editor at large Chris Cillizza said on CNN’s Situation Room[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=061-e65&t=c> (12/17), “I would rank it this way. Some sort of short-term bridge thing that gets them into January and through the holidays, number one, most likely. ... Number two, shutdown. Number three, deal. ... If Donald Trump wants to make this a place where he’s going to fight on the $5 billion in funding, it’s just very problematic to see how that gets through.” *House Democrats Preparing For “Long-Term Shutdown.” *The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=062-43e&t=c> (12/17, Elis) reports, “House Democrats are making plans for a prolonged shutdown.” One Democratic aide said, “We’re making contingency plans for a long-term shutdown. ... If the shutdown goes until Jan. 3, we’ll bring up a funding bill.” Democrats take over the House that day, and “would likely be able to pass a bill funding the government with no money for Trump’s wall. Republicans would hold the majority in the Senate, and it’s unclear what they’d do since they would need some Democratic votes to overcome a filibuster in that chamber.” ABC News <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=063-cd4&t=c> (12/17, Parkinson) reported on its website that if there is a shutdown, “it would look a little different than past instances, mostly because Congress has already funded about 75 percent of the federal government.” McClatchy <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=064-dd8&t=c> (12/17, Clark) says the impact of a shutdown “may be difficult to see.” While “nine Cabinet agencies and several smaller departments...could close,” other agencies, “including the Pentagon, Health and Human Services, Education and energy and water programs, have been funded through the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30, 2019.” In addition, “most federal employees who perform high-profile, essential duties for officially unfunded agencies— such as the Transportation Security Agency officers manning airport checkpoints — would stay on the job, even as their paychecks are suspended.” The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=065-dfa&t=c> (12/17, Dinan, Sherfinski) reports that “essential government employees could be forced to stay on the job throughout a government shutdown — even if they’d already planned to take holiday vacations” due to “a quirk of federal law” that “says paid leave is considered government spending.” Since “no unauthorized spending can happen during a funding lapse, no one can take vacation.” However, they “could be eligible for double pay should the shutdown last long enough to make them miss a paycheck, thanks to a federal judge’s ruling earlier this decade.” Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) was asked on CNN’s Situation Room[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=066-fc0&t=c> (12/17, 6:18 p.m. EDT) about the possibility of a government shutdown. Hirono said, “We already approved over 1.5 billion for border security, and we know that the Trump Administration has not figured out how to spend all of that. So when you really sit down and think about 1,100 miles of a physical barrier and a wall, of which of this 1,100 miles the United States government only controls a certain percentage of land and the rest will have to be obtained through eminent domain, one wonders how serious is this border wall.” *USA Today Poll: Americans Oppose Shutdown, Would Blame Trump And GOP. *USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=067-d43&t=c> (12/17, Page, Theobald) reports, “Americans have a clear message to Washington as the government hurtles toward a partial shutdown on Friday: Don’t. By a double-digit margin” of 54 percent to 29 percent, respondents in a new USA Today/Suffolk University poll “say they oppose the shutdown that President Trump has threatened if Congress doesn’t agree to his demand for $5 billion in funding for a border wall,” and “by nearly 2-1, Americans would blame Trump and the Republicans, not congressional Democrats. Forty-three percent would blame the president and the GOP, while 24 percent would hold congressional Democrats responsible.” Jennifer Rubin of the Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=068-673&t=c> (12/17) writes, “It is true that two-thirds of Republicans, who simply cannot bring themselves to oppose Trump on anything no matter what, favor a shutdown stunt. Trump, it seems, learned nothing from the election in which his party was thrashed everywhere outside the Trump cult.” But it is “far from clear how Trump is going to get out of the corner he is painting himself into.” *McAleenan: “We Need A Wall.” *CBP Commissioner Kevin McAleenan said on Fox News’ Fox & Friends[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=069-ddd&t=c> (12/17), “We need a wall. ... Areas of the border where you have a large population center on the south side and immediate access to transportation hubs or neighborhoods, you have to have a wall between those two areas to help slow people down from crossing. Other areas, aircraft patrol of those areas is absolutely appropriate. You need a combination.” DHS Reportedly Barred House Members From Interviewing CBP Agents Involved In Girl’s Detention. The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=06a-a7d&t=c> (12/17, Wise) reports DHS “reportedly told members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) that they will not be permitted to interview Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents involved in detaining” seven-year-old Jakelin Caal Maquin, “the young migrant girl who died after being taken into federal custody.” Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-TX) “reportedly said that if lawmakers were not allowed to talk with agents during their visit on Tuesday then they could expect to be called before Congress after Democrats are back in the majority next month.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=06b-2e7&t=c> (12/17, Miroff) says that according to statement from the caucus, after their tour, the lawmakers plan to hold a news conference to describe “how these stations are equipped to protect the health and safety of those seeking refuge at our borders.” USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=06c-6d6&t=c> (12/17, Gomez) reports a DHS spokeswoman “said Monday that the agents will already speak with the department’s Inspector General, which is conducting an investigation into the girl’s death, and that they can’t be forced to speak with members of Congress while that process is ongoing.” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=06d-892&t=c> (12/17, Watson) reports that linguistic issues may have played some role in her death. Her father had “signed a form stating that his daughter was in good health. But it’s unclear how much the man understood on the form, which was written in English and read to him in Spanish by Border Patrol agents. ... Her father’s native language is the Mayan tongue known as Q’eqchi’. His second language is Spanish.” *Roughly Half Of Troops Deployed To US-Mexico Border Have Been Withdrawn. *The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=06e-665&t=c> (12/17, Mitchell) reports, “Roughly half of the 5,900 active duty troops sent to the US-Mexico border have returned home,” according to Pentagon spokesman Army Col. Rob Manning. Manning said 3,150 active-duty troops “remain at the southern border, including 1,200 in California, 1,050 in Texas and 900 in Arizona.” *“ICE Air” Flights Deport About 100,000 Per Year. *The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018121801biden&r=email-d1df&l=06f-ac9&t=c> (12/17, Merchant, Kastanis) runs a feature on “ICE Air,” the “obscure division” of ICE that “operates hundreds of flights each year to remove immigrants. Deportation flights are big business: The US government has spent approximately $1 billion on them in the last decade, and the Trump administration is seeking to raise ICE’s budget for charter flights by 30 percent.” ICE Air Operations “transports detained immigrants between Americ
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AQJvWREcoEzmlag6wDFKb0qsAxOQYqRPEmDw
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<0.0.0.3E.1D496D0E477F7DB.0@colo033.bulletinnews.com>
REFS:
<0.0.0.3E.1D496D0E477F7DB.0@colo033.bulletinnews.com>