EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
FW: Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing for Thursday, January 3, 2019
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
K
kchung@vpbiden.org
DATE:
2019-01-03 14:22:42
MSG_ID:
<5fe04dba0d19155d89537a3cfc8ce0d4@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Valerie Biden Owens
<hurricane5155@gmail.com>
J
Jimmy Biden
<jbiden@lionhallgp.com>
J
Jill Tracy Biden
<jill.tracy2@gmail.com>
R
Hunter Biden
<rhbdc@icloud.com>
T
Ashley Blazer Biden
<trailblazerbiden@gmail.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing *From:* Bulletin Intelligence <Biden@BulletinIntelligence.com> *Sent:* Thursday, January 3, 2019 7:57 AM *To:* Biden@BulletinIntelligence.com *Subject:* Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing for Thursday, January 3, 2019 *Click to access <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=000-2a0&t=c> mobile-optimized online version, including download options and an audio reader.* [image: Image removed by sender. Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=001-7cc&t=c> *To: Vice President Joe Biden* *Thursday, January 3, 2019 8:00 AM EST* Today's Table of Contents *Biden in the News* <#SECTION_1> • Cuomo: Among 2020 Democratic Contenders, Biden “Has The Best Case.” <#S1> • Daily Beast Examines Biden’s “Strengths And Weaknesses.” <#S2> • CNN Examines “Fundraising Picture” For Biden, Other Potential 2020 Candidates. <#S3> • States’ Change From Caucuses To Primaries May Hurt Sanders, Boost Biden. <#S4> • Sanders Says He Didn’t Know About Harassment Claims In 2016 Campaign. <#S5> • Warren To Visit Iowa This Weekend. <#S6> • The Atlantic: Inslee Is “Going To Run For President” On The Issue Of Climate Change. <#S7> *Leading the News* <#SECTION_2> • Media Analyses: Little Progress Made At White House Meeting On Border Security. <#S8> *Foreign Policy* <#SECTION_3> • Trump Says He Plans To Meet With Kim Again, But Is “Not In Any Rush.” <#S9> • Trump Again Says US Withdrawal From Syria Will Not Be Immediate. <#S10> • Pompeo Demands Answers On Marine Veteran Held In Russia. <#S11> • Pompeo, Bolsonaro Discuss Working Together On Venezuela, Cuba, And Nicaragua. <#S12> • Shanahan: Pentagon’s Focus Should Be On China. <#S13> • Xi: Taiwan Can Become Part Of China Without Giving Up Its “Different System.” <#S14> • AP Analysis: Israeli Settlement Building Has Accelerated Since Trump Took Office. <#S15> *Domestic Policy* <#SECTION_4> • Trump To Romney: “Be A TEAM Player & WIN.” <#S16> • Trump On Mattis: “Obama Fired Him, And Essentially So Did I.” <#S17> • SCOTUS Could Rule Any Time On Mueller Subpoena For Information From Foreign Company. <#S18> • Nadler Reiterates Threat To Subpoena Whitaker. <#S19> • Trump Predicts Stocks Will Soar “Once We Settle Trade Issues.” <#S20> • Trump Predicts Supreme Court Will Strike Down ACA. <#S21> • Senate Approves 77 Trump Nominees On Final Day Of 115th Congress. <#S22> *Cancer Research* <#SECTION_5> • Cancer Moonshot Initiative Aims To Improve Smoking Cessation At NCI-Designated Cancer Centers. <#S23> • Biomedical Researchers, Companies Lament Impact Of Government Shutdown. <#S24> *Editorials/Op-Eds* <#SECTION_6> • New York Times. <#S25> • Washington Post. <#S26> Biden in the News Cuomo: Among 2020 Democratic Contenders, Biden “Has The Best Case.” On the CBS Evening News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=002-b5d&t=c> (1/2, story 3, 0:40, Glor), Ed O’Keefe reported that former Vice President Joe Biden, who is mulling a 2020 White House bid, “seemed to get an endorsement of sorts [on Wednesday] from New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D), who said he thinks Biden has the best case to make among Democrats. Cuomo said he is not running.” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=003-347&t=c> (1/2) reported that in an interview with WAMC, Cuomo said, “The problem for the Democrats is going to be this: It’s going to be credibility. Of all the names that are out there, I think Joe Biden has the best case. ... He brings the most of the secret ingredient you need to win for a Democrat, which is credibility.” Newsday (NY) <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=004-abe&t=c> (1/2, Gormley) reports that Cuomo “said [President] Trump was elected because voters don’t believe any politicians and were asking: ‘What have you done to help me in my life? ... Where is the credibility in you argument? ... Joe Biden can say, ‘I was there.’” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=005-9a6&t=c> (1/2, Wagner) quoted Cuomo as saying, “You don’t hire an airline pilot who has never flown a plane. Joe Biden can say ‘I was there – I was not the president, but I was the second seat.’” Biden, “a longtime friend of Cuomo, offered a high-profile endorsement last year during Cuomo’s reelection campaign, in which he faced a Democratic primary challenge from Cynthia Nixon, the liberal activist and actress best known for her role in ‘Sex and the City.’” POLITICO New York <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=006-03c&t=c> (1/2, Mahoney) reported that Biden “has compared Cuomo to Abraham Lincoln and praised the governor in a television advertisement that ran in the weeks before the 2018 primary. Asked whether he’d be open to being Biden’s running mate, Cuomo responded: ‘I am not even focusing on any of that. What I’m doing is what I believe I need to do for this state.’” The New York Daily News <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=007-8d9&t=c> (1/2, Lovett) reports that Cuomo “deflected a question about whether he’d be interested in being Biden’s 2020 running mate, though he didn’t rule it out.” In an online article, CNN <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=008-5d8&t=c> (1/2, Saenz) reported that Cuomo’s remarks “came after he was asked about the prospects of Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who launched an exploratory committee on Monday ahead of an expected presidential run. ‘I think there’s going to be a big field. I think the problem for the Democrats is going to be this: it is going to be credibility,’ Cuomo said. ‘I think that the main issue for the Democrats is not going to be the articulation of the negative. It is going to be the articulation of the positive and...credibility.’” The Buffalo (NY) News <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=009-f6b&t=c> (1/2, Precious) reports that Cuomo “did not mention, by name, any of the other Democrats looking at a 2020 White House run, including” Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY). The New York Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=00a-1b9&t=c> (1/2, Campanile) says, “Cuomo’s pitch for” Biden “is a slap at...Gillibrand, who is also mulling a run for the White House.” Among the other media outlets reporting on Cuomo’s remarks about Biden are the Poughkeepsie (NY) Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=00b-efc&t=c> (1/2, Campbell), The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=00c-033&t=c> (1/2, Bowden), the Daily Caller <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=00d-8da&t=c> (1/2, Rodgers), National Review <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=00e-940&t=c> (1/2, McArdle), and the Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=00f-029&t=c> (1/2, Vielkind). Daily Beast Examines Biden’s “Strengths And Weaknesses.” The Daily Beast <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=010-e97&t=c> (1/3, Resnick) says it “spoke with opposition researchers and operatives in both parties to get a sense of” the “strengths and weaknesses” of various potential 2020 Democratic presidential hopefuls. Those interviewed “say that, among all the possible” contenders, former Vice President Joe Biden “has the clearest set of strengths and weaknesses – a byproduct of his extended time in politics.” As strengths, those interviewed cited Biden’s experience, his ties to former President Obama, and his ability to raise cash. As weaknesses, the article says Biden’s “experience is what could turn off a lot of Democratic primary voters, particularly younger ones.” Other weaknesses include Biden’s votes in favor of “the 1994 crime bill” and “the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999”; his “handling of the Anita Hill hearings”; and his previous failed White House runs. CNN Examines “Fundraising Picture” For Biden, Other Potential 2020 Candidates. In an online article, CNN <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=011-ca8&t=c> (1/2, Schouten) offered “a look at the early fundraising picture for some of the possible” 2020 Democratic presidential hopefuls. CNN said that former Vice President Joe Biden is able to “draw on extensive ties to Democratic fundraisers forged during a Senate career that began in 1973 and as part of an Obama-Biden team that raised a combined $1.5 billion over two presidential elections. Since leaving office in January 2017, Biden also has built a network of nonprofits and academic institutions staffed by former aides and close allies, likely enabling him to quickly assemble a campaign infrastructure.” And Biden’s PAC, “American Possibilities, raised more than $2.5 million since it was launched in 2017 and doled out more than $500,000 to Democratic candidates and committees during the 2018 midterms.” States’ Change From Caucuses To Primaries May Hurt Sanders, Boost Biden. Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=012-b81&t=c> (1/3, Otterbein) reports that Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “surprise performance against Hillary Clinton in 2016 was fueled by his dominance in a slate of states that voted by caucus, a format that allowed” him “to capitalize on his smaller but more fervent base of supporters.” However, some “states that caucused in 2016 will hold primaries instead in 2020, potentially dealing a blow to Sanders and other Democratic hopefuls with zealous followings.” Ex-DNC chief Ed Rendell cited Sens. Kamala Harris (D-CA) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) “as others who could ‘suffer’ from the change,” and mentioned former Vice President Joe Biden as among those who’d benefit from the change. Said Rendell, “I think it helps Biden a lot. Although he’s very popular among Democrats, he doesn’t produce the same kind of frantic dedication as some of the most active progressives.” Sanders Says He Didn’t Know About Harassment Claims In 2016 Campaign. The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=013-46a&t=c> (1/2, Ember, Benner) reports that as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) prepares for a possible 2020 run for president, allegations “of sexual harassment and demeaning treatment as well as pay disparity in” his “2016 campaign...have circulated in recent weeks in emails, online comments and private discussions among former supporters.” Sanders’ “perceived failure to address this issue has damaged his progressive bona fides, delegates and nearly a dozen former state and national staff members said in interviews over the last month. And it has raised questions among them about whether he can adequately fight for the interests of women, who have increasingly defined the Democratic Party in the Trump era, if he runs again for the presidential nomination in 2020.” USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=014-72a&t=c> (1/2, Lam) reports that in the wake of the Times’ story, Sanders said during a Wednesday appearance on CNN “that he did not know about sexual harassment and pay disparity allegations during his 2016 presidential campaign.” Sanders also “apologized to ‘any woman who feels like she was not treated appropriately.’ When asked if he had been aware of the complaints, Sanders said, ‘I was little bit busy running around the country trying to make the case (to be elected as president).’” The Huffington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=015-bd1&t=c> (1/2, Visser) reported that Sanders said his 2016 campaign “exploded in size over several months as his team hired more than 1,200 employees. Sanders suggested that disorganization may have led to instances of inappropriate behavior within his campaign.” Said Sanders, “I’m not going to sit here and tell you that we did everything right in terms of human resources, in terms of addressing the needs that I’m hearing from now, that women felt disrespected, that there was sexual harassment which was not dealt with as effectively as possible.” The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=016-116&t=c> (1/2, Daugherty) reported that Sanders said “that if he ran for president again in 2020, he would ‘do better next time.’” Sanders also “said that in his recently successful re-election campaign for Senate, he put several principles and policies in place, including training programs and reporting procedures that he called the ‘gold standard.’” Warren To Visit Iowa This Weekend. The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=017-ab7&t=c> (1/2, Leblanc) reports that Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) “is preparing to bring a populist message to Iowa voters just days after taking her first major step toward launching a campaign for president.” Warren is planning “to start her swing through Iowa on Friday with a stop at an organizing event in Council Bluffs followed by similar events on Saturday in Sioux City and Des Moines and a roundtable discussion in Storm Lake.” *Warren’s Iowa Hires Include Key Aide Who Worked On Sanders’ 2016 Campaign. *The Des Moines (IA) Register <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=018-1fd&t=c> (1/2, Pfannenstiel) reports that Warren “is staffing up in Iowa ahead of a presumed 2020 presidential run. A spokeswoman confirmed Wednesday that Warren” has “hired Kane Miller, Emily Parcell, Janice Rottenberg and Brendan Summers. Parcell was Barack Obama’s political director during his 2008 caucus campaign and went on to act as his state director in Indiana during the general election.” Miller served as “a regional field director for Hillary Clinton” during the 2016 campaign “and later worked as her state director in the general election.” Rottenberg “has served as the coordinated campaign director for the Iowa Democratic Party in 2018, and in 2016 she worked for Clinton in Iowa.” And Summers worked on “Bernie Sanders’ 2016 run as his Iowa and national caucus director.” Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=019-894&t=c> (1/2, Korecki) reported that Summers is “a notable recruit for Warren given Sanders’ unexpected success in the state and the perception that both Sanders and Warren are likely to draw from a similar progressive-minded base. ‘I think he knows caucus math better than anybody else in the country,’ Pete D’Alessandro, Sanders’ former state director, said of Summers. ‘Basically, he wrote the caucus rules 10 years ago when he was the state’s caucus director.’” In an online article, CNN <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=01a-1a8&t=c> (1/2, Lee, Krieg) reported, “By hiring Summers, who is held in high regard by Sanders allies, Warren is sending a powerful early message to progressive activists and political strategists closely watching how the Democratic field takes shape.” *NBC News: Warren Instagram Video Is Being Called “Inauthentic Pandering.” *On NBC’s Today[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=01b-2a4&t=c> (1/2), reporter Kristen Welker said that Warren is now “the biggest name in the Democratic field to signal she is running for president,” and “is already a political foil for President Trump.” Welker said that Trump “has repeatedly ridiculed Warren over her claims of Native-American ancestry, using language that’s offensive.” Welker said that Warren got “mixed reviews in October” when she “releas[ed] a DNA test, reporting strong evidence she had a Native-American relative, dating back six to ten generations.” Welker added that Warren’s Instagram video of her drinking a beer has been dismissed as “inauthentic pandering to young voters.” On NBC Nightly News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=01c-325&t=c> (1/2, story 3, 0:30, Holt), Welker offered a similar report, saying that Warren received “mixed reviews over this Instagram the day of her announcement.” Warren was shown saying, “Hold on a sec, I’m going to get me a beer.” Welker added, “Critics calling it inauthentic pandering to younger voters.” *CNN Political Analyst Enten Says Warren “Below Average” In Electability. *The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=01d-2f7&t=c> (1/2, Birnbaum) reported that CNN political analyst Harry Enten on Wednesday “wrote <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=01e-b78&t=c> that [Warren] is ‘below average’ in electability based on an analysis of her Senate race performance in 2018 compared to House Democrats in her state. Enten analyzed the ‘electability’ of six possible presidential candidates” based on the same analyses, writing, “Sens. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Sherrod Brown of Ohio are above-average candidates on the question of electability, while Sen. Elizabeth Warren...is below average.” While Brown and Klobuchar overperformed in their respective races, said Enten, Warren “underperformed by 12 points.” *Warren Supports Withdrawing Troops From Syria, Afghanistan. *Axios <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=01f-689&t=c> (1/2, Britzky) reports that during a Wednesday appearance on MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow Show[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=020-ca1&t=c>, Warren “voiced support for the idea of withdrawing troops from Syria and Afghanistan.” Warren “said that the answer from the foreign policy establishment to the situation in the Middle East” appears to be, “Stay forever. That is not a policy. We can’t do that.” However, Warren said the plan should be coordinated with allies and that she disagrees with the President conducting “foreign policy by tweet.” The Atlantic: Inslee Is “Going To Run For President” On The Issue Of Climate Change. Writing for The Atlantic <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=021-ccd&t=c> (1/2), Edward-Isaac Dovere said that Gov. Jay Inslee (D-WA) is convinced that climate change is an extreme global threat – but one that President Trump dismisses and that the field of potential 2020 Democratic presidential candidates hasn’t done enough to address. “And that’s why he’s going to run for president. The question is whether he can convince anyone else that he’s a big-enough player to be a serious candidate. ‘When you’ve been working on something for over a decade, and now seeing people awakening to that, it’s just really gratifying and heartening,’” Inslee said in an interview. Dovere added, “If there is a new Democratic president come 2021, he or she will get pulled in all sorts of policy directions. Inslee says he has one priority: global warming.” Leading the News Media Analyses: Little Progress Made At White House Meeting On Border Security. Coverage of the ongoing partial shutdown of the federal government agrees that little progress was made at a Wednesday White House meeting with incoming congressional leaders, with both President Trump and top Democrats refusing to budge from the positions on border security funding they have held since the standoff began. Trump rejected a compromise previously worked out with Democrats by Vice President Pence, and Democrats vowed to pass funding measures without border wall funding immediately after taking control of the House Thursday. The President tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=022-7e2&t=c> after the meeting, “Important meeting today on Border Security with Republican and Democrat Leaders in Congress. Both parties must work together to pass a Funding Bill that protects this Nation and its people – this is the first and most important duty of government. ... <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=023-517&t=c> I remain ready and willing to work with Democrats to pass a bill that secures our borders, supports the agents and officers on the ground, and keeps America Safe. Let’s get it done!” He later tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=024-460&t=c>, “Sadly, there can be no REAL Border Security without the Wall!” The story led all three broadcast network newscasts. David Muir opened ABC World News Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=025-a9e&t=c> (1/2, lead story, 3:00) by calling it “a new year, but the same ugly showdown. And tonight, it is only worsening. ... As this government shutdown now reaches Day 12, 800,000 American workers [are] affected. So many of them waiting to go back to work; thousands more may not get back pay. The President making it clear today that he is not budging. He wants that $5.6 billion to build his border wall, vowing to keep the government closed ‘as long as it takes.’” ABC’s Mary Bruce: “The President publicly rejected a $2.5 billion compromise proposed to Democrats by his own Vice President. Would you accept anything less than $2.5 billion?” Trump: “No, not 2.5, no. We’re asking for 5.6 and you know, somebody said 2.5. Ah, no, look – this is national security we’re talking about.” Bruce: “Democrats made clear they aren’t budging, either.” Senate Minority Leader Schumer: “They are now feeling the heat. It’s not helping the President, it’s not helping the Republicans to be the owners of this shutdown.” Incoming House Speaker Pelosi: “We’re asking the President to open up government. We are giving him a Republican path to do that. Why would he not do it?” David Glor said on the CBS Evening News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=026-241&t=c> (1/2, lead story, 2:35), “They were looking for a breakthrough. They did not find one.” CBS’ Major Garrett: “The impasse will continue until at least Friday, when the President has asked congressional leaders back to the White House. He offered no clues on when government will reopen.” Trump: “Could be a long time, or it could be quickly. It could be a long time.” Garrett: “Publicly, the President is sticking to his demand for $5 billion for a wall on the southern border. Democrats have offered roughly a fifth of that amount for border security, but not wall construction. ... After meeting with Mr. Trump in the situation room for about 90 minutes, top Democrats said polls show the country is on their side.” Lester Holt said on NBC Nightly News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=027-c28&t=c> (1/2, lead story, 2:25) reported, “There was movement today in the effort to fully reopen the government. Unfortunately, none of it seemed to be the direction of a deal. President Trump met with congressional leaders, but first making it clear he is not budging from his demand for $5 billion in border wall funding. Democrats holding their own, too.” In a clip of an interview with Pelosi to air on NBC’s Today on Thursday, Savannah Guthrie asked, “If you and the Democrats can’t meet halfway, if you don’t compromise, then why isn’t the shutdown partially your responsibility, as well?” Pelosi: “It has nothing to do with us. It has the President saying, ‘I will hold six agencies of government hostage to my campaign promise that I was going to build a wall, and that Mexico was going to pay for it.’” On CNN’s Situation Room[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=028-217&t=c> (1/2), Kaitlyn Collins reported Trump sent signals the government shutdown “could drag on for many more days or even weeks.” Trump spent the morning “claiming Mexico is paying for the wall through the recently renegotiated trade deal with Canada and Mexico, an idea that has stumped lawmakers and aides alike since it hasn’t even passed Congress yet.” Collins added that Trump “falsely [claimed] most of the wall has been built, when in fact none of it has.” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=029-685&t=c> (1/3, Miller, Mascaro) reports, “No one budged” at the Wednesday meeting “so the partial government shutdown persisted. ... They’ll all try again Friday. In public, Trump renewed his dire warnings of rapists and others at the border. But when pressed in private by Democrats asking why he wouldn’t end the shutdown, he responded at one point, ‘I would look foolish if I did that.’” The Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=02a-dd7&t=c> (1/2, A1, Andrews) reports Schumer asked Trump three times why he would not support bills to reopen all of the government except DHS, reportedly prompting Trump’s comment. The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=02b-167&t=c> (1/2, Davis, Tackett) reports the President “torched a compromise that his own vice president floated.” The Times says Trump “also rejected suggestions from Republican senators that negotiators revive a compromise that would twin border-wall money with legislation to shield young immigrants brought to the country illegally as children from deportation and grant them legal work permits.” According to the Times, Trump’s comments constituted “a remarkable public rejection of a plan” that Vice President Pence “broached with Democrats behind closed doors 12 days ago...and which his team has quietly continued to push in the days since.” USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=02c-52c&t=c> (1/2, Jackson) reports incoming House Minority Leader McCarthy said of the shutdown, “It doesn’t have to last much longer at all.” But Senate Majority Leader McConnell “struck a less optimistic note: ‘I don’t think any particular progress was made’ at the White House session.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=02d-b2f&t=c> (1/2, A1, Werner) reports, “Trump rejected a plan from Democrats on Wednesday to reopen key parts of the federal government” as “the shutdown’s effects are spreading, particularly in the Washington region.” Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=02e-808&t=c> (1/2, Mason, Becker) reports, “The White House convened the meeting to try to convince Democrats that funding a wall on the southern border with Mexico was a pressing security need. Instead, Democratic leaders cut off” DHS Secretary Nielsen’s presentation “and tried to no avail to press Trump to accept their offer.” The New York Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=02f-1c1&t=c> (1/2, Schwab, Fredericks) reports McCarthy said of the Democrats, “I think they wanted to go on without going through the briefing, they wanted to go on with their bill that they were bringing up tomorrow.” The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=030-1dd&t=c> (1/2, Dinan) reports Democrats vowed to “plow ahead with spending bills this week that have already been rejected by the GOP.” Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=031-c1f&t=c> (1/2, Ferris, Everett) calls the briefing “the Trump administration’s attempt to lecture Democrats on border security issues,” while the Daily Caller <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=032-141&t=c> (1/2, Enjeti) says the Democrats brought the briefing “to a screeching halt” by “refusing to even listen” to Nielsen. Nielsen later tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=033-9b8&t=c>, “At today’s Cabinet Meeting, @POTUS again reiterated his strong commitment to border security. During this shutdown the men and women of DHS remain on duty doing their jobs. Congress should do theirs & fund the wall and revise outdated laws (TVPRA & Flores) to secure the border.” Incoming House Minority Whip Scalise said on Fox News’ Hannity[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=034-c0b&t=c> (1/2), “What you saw today with the meeting in the White House with the President is an example what we have saw for a long time. A lot of these Democrats who, as Chuck Schumer did in 2006, voted for a wall, voted for, by the way, $25 billion for the wall. Now the President is saying we need $5 billion next year and they are opposing it because of Donald Trump, not because of any policy issues.” Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) said on CNN’s Situation Room[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=035-9ed&t=c> (1/2), “Two weeks ago, the United States Senate unanimously passed a funding bill because Majority Leader Mitch McConnell had heard from the White House that President Trump would sign it. He then changed his mind, and the next day reversed position and said he would only sign a funding bill if it had full funding for his $5 billion for border wall. That’s where we stand now a dozen days later.” Rep. John Garamendi (D-CA) said on CNN’s Situation Room[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=036-a2c&t=c> (1/2), “[Democrats] are going to pass legislation tomorrow, moments after we begin the new session, after we have a new Speaker, after we have the majority...to fund all of government for the remainder of this fiscal year.” Garamendi added, “We will leave the Department of Homeland Security...open for further negotiation until February 8 with a continuing resolution for that.” Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) writes in the Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=037-6ce&t=c> (1/2), “Democrats should recognize now, as I did with Obama in 2015, that if an elected president has a legitimate objective, they should bend over backward to accommodate it – if they want a result. As for President Trump, he should be specific and reliable, as [President] Obama was in 2015 when he told us he needed three things, and, after Congress passed legislation that included the president’s requests, he signed the bill into law.” USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=038-6b5&t=c> (1/2) says in an editorial that “this shutdown is both destructive and inane.” Democrats “are happy to finally be in the position of being able to say no to Trump and want to display that power to their rank-and-file voters,” while the President “has spent his first two years catering to his base and ignoring or insulting just about everyone else. He does not appear inclined to change that now. This leaves much of the country wondering when this desultory fight over a relatively small matter will come to an end.” In a responding USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=039-0a5&t=c> (1/2) op-ed, James Jay Carafano of the Heritage Foundation writes, “There is never a good time for a desperate fight. But sensible border security is worth it. Time for both sides to put the politics aside and come up with solutions that deal with the magnitude of the impending problem.” Bloomberg News <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=03a-149&t=c> (1/2, Wasson, Olorunnipa), the Washington Examiner <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=03b-229&t=c> (1/2, Ferrechio), and Axios <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=03c-7fe&t=c> (1/2, Vavra) also have reports, while Susan Page of USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=03d-d97&t=c> (1/2) writes that the meeting previewed the “standoff” between the President and Pelosi “that will define Washington for the next two years.” *WPost Analysis: Trump Made Multiple False Statements Wednesday. *The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=03e-5b3&t=c> (1/2, A1, Werner) reports that “in one of a series of false or unsupported assertions” on Wednesday, the President “said that there were between 30 million and 35 million undocumented immigrants in the United States, roughly three times larger than the estimate of most experts.” Earlier on Twitter <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=03f-2e0&t=c>, “Trump made two other false claims about the wall. He wrote that Mexico would be paying for the wall along the U.S. border under the parameters of a trade deal he has tentatively inked with Mexico and Canada. This is not true. ... The second false point in Trump’s Twitter post Wednesday is his statement that ‘much of the Wall has already been fully renovated or built.’ This is also not true.” *Trump Says Court Ruling Led Democrats To Abandon DACA Talks. * Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=040-3f3&t=c> (1/2, Kullgren) reports the President blamed the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals “for killing a nascent deal last year between Republicans and Democrats to codify the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.” During the Wednesday Cabinet meeting, Trump “said he’d been nearing a deal with Democrats in November to protect DACA legislatively in exchange for heightened border security – but that Democrats walked away” after the Ninth Circuit ruled in their favor. The President said, “We had a deal pretty close to being done, and a lot of people say I backed away from that deal. I didn’t back away. The minute the judge overruled the case and they allowed DACA, they didn’t talk to us – and I don’t blame them – they didn’t answer the calls.” *Acting ICE Chief Says Border “Barrier” Needed. *Acting ICE Director Ron Vitiello said on Fox News Special Report[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=041-b2e&t=c> (1/2), “I was very disappointed to see in that room today that there were people who were in this discussion that were saying a wall doesn’t work. I can tell you that through 33 years of my experience, half of which was on the line, those agents need an enduring capability to slow people down as they come across that border. ... You always have a safer border where you have that barrier. There is no question in my mind about that.” *Shutdown Hampering Immigration System. *The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=042-25b&t=c> (1/2, A1, Miroff) reports, “Tens of thousands of U.S. immigration officers and agents are showing up for work each day to guard the Mexico border, where President Trump insists on putting a wall. But the government is shut down, so no one is getting paid.” In immigration courts, “new filings are piling up on dockets already backlogged by nearly 1 million cases, but many of the judges and clerks who process them have been sent home.” The E-Verify website is also not in service. Rep. Val Demings (D-FL) tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=043-364&t=c>, “Immigration officers and agents are working without pay. Cases are piling up. The E-Verify system is offline. The #TrumpShutdown is breaking our immigration system, all because Trump, the ‘deal maker’, won’t sign an EXISTING bipartisan compromise.” *NYTimes, WPost: Shutdown Hurting Government Workers. *The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=044-0f8&t=c> (1/2) says in an editorial that the President should take time to “learn much about the legions of government employees and contractors who spent the holiday season agonizing over how to cover their next mortgage payment or electric bill or trip to the grocery store if this political charade drags on much longer. Let’s be clear: This fight is not about security. ... There is no flood of savage foreigners pouring across the border,” and “Congress, on a bipartisan basis, has already been allocating more money for border security.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=045-428&t=c> (1/2) similarly editorializes, “Like civil servants, hourly workers for government contractors do not collect their pay during shutdowns; unlike civil servants, however, they do not get back pay when the shutdown ends. How many low-wage workers face this predicament is difficult to ascertain,” but “the number could be approximately 2,000, based on estimates from the union that represents many such employees. ... The standoff continues, and yet another vulnerable population pays the price.” Foreign Policy Trump Says He Plans To Meet With Kim Again, But Is “Not In Any Rush.” Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=046-bc7&t=c> (1/2, Mason) reports that President Trump said he has “received a letter from North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and expected to meet him again soon as part of the U.S. administration’s efforts to press Pyongyang to give up its nuclear weapons program.” According to Reuters, Trump also “defended his negotiations with Kim and said he had never emphasized the speed of Pyongyang’s denuclearization.” Reuters says Trump told reporters that Kim’s letter “was great and that he would love to read it out loud, but did not do so.” Reuters adds that the President “has said previously that a second summit with Kim was likely in January or February, though he wrote on Twitter last month that he was ‘in no hurry.’” Bloomberg News <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=047-3f9&t=c> (1/2, Olorunnipa) reports that Trump said, “We’ve really established a very good relationship” one day after Kim “threatened to backtrack on promises to give up his nuclear arsenal if the U.S. doesn’t relax sanctions against the country.” Bloomberg News adds that Trump also said “there would have been a ‘big fat war in Asia’ if he hadn’t met with Kim in Singapore last year, and that ‘they really want to do something’ to reduce tensions between the countries. But he added that he’s ‘not in any rush’ to hold a second meeting.” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=048-a67&t=c> (1/2) reports that “earlier in the day, Trump tweeted that Kim has pledged not to make or test nuclear weapons, or give them to others.” The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=049-f57&t=c> (1/2, Landler, Haberman) reports President Trump “was at it again, brandishing his latest letter from” Kim in Trump’s “favorite parlor trick.” Trump “delights in sharing with visitors the correspondence he has received from” Kim. The Times adds this behavior is part of Trump’s “long history of showing off to visitors.” Trump Again Says US Withdrawal From Syria Will Not Be Immediate. Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=04a-253&t=c> (1/2) reports that during Wednesday’s Cabinet meeting at the White House, President Trump said the US will “get out of Syria ‘over a period of time’ and wants to protect the U.S.-backed Kurdish fighters in the country as Washington draws down troops.” According to Reuters, Trump “did not provide a timetable for the planned military exit from Syria,” and “said he had never discussed a reported four-month timetable for the withdrawal of 2,000 American troops stationed in Syria.” Reuters says that “in recent days, Trump appeared to back off from any hasty pullout and stressed that the operation would be slow.” *Romney Troubled By “Precipitous” Withdrawal From Syria. *Sen.-elect Mitt Romney (R-UT) was asked on CNN’s The Lead[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=04b-0a4&t=c> (1/2) why he believes the President is making a mistake by pulling US troops out of Syria. Romney said, “The reason that we’re in involved is to make the world safer, which is good for the world and good for us. ... And so we’re in Syria with a very small footprint, about 2,000 people to help our allies there, the Kurds. And in some respects, to provide some stability to that region so that Assad or Erdoğan or the Russians or the – you know, the Iranians don’t rush in and slaughter people. Slaughter our allies. So pulling out on a precipitous basis without interacting with them and coordinating this with them and getting the input, for instance, from Secretary Mattis, is something which I think is very troubling to me and to a number of others.” *WPost: Trump Should Be More Clear About Syria, Afghanistan Plans. *A Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=04c-df9&t=c> (1/2) editorial says the President’s plan for withdrawing US troops from Syria are “anything but transparent” and his “Afghanistan plans are even more opaque.” Trump “continues to defend the withdrawals, though without offering substantive arguments.” The Post argues he “owes those soldiers, and the country as a whole, a better explanation. If he believes the United States should no longer fight the Islamic State in Syria, or the Taliban and Islamic State in Afghanistan, he should deliver a substantive address to the country laying out why.” Pompeo Demands Answers On Marine Veteran Held In Russia. Martha Raddatz reported on ABC World News Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=04d-fad&t=c> (1/2, story 3, 1:50, Muir), “Secretary of State Mike Pompeo wants answers” about why Russia is holding American Paul Whelan on accusations of espionage. Pompeo was shown saying, “If the detention is not appropriate, we will demand his immediate return.” Raddatz added that Whelan, who was kicked out of the Marine Corps, “has visited Russia multiple times” and was there to attend a friend’s wedding. Similarly, the CBS Evening News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=04e-58a&t=c> (1/2, story 4, 2:05, Glor) reported, “Pompeo is demanding answers on this arrest.” Pompeo was shown saying, “We’ve made clear to the Russians our expectation that we will learn more about the charges, come to understand what it is he’s been accused of, and if the detention is not appropriate, we will demand his immediate return.” CBS (Crawford) added, “State Department officials and Ambassador Jon Huntsman met with Whelan five days after his arrest.” Meanwhile, the “Russians have offered no evidence Whelan, now head of corporate security for a Michigan autoparts company, is a spy.” There is “speculation that Whelan got caught up in a diplomatic tit-for-tat after the US arrested Maria Butina on espionage charges,” and Russian President Vladimir Putin warned that “the law of retaliation states an eye for an eye or a tooth for a tooth.” On CNN’s Situation Room[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=04f-6cd&t=c> (1/2), Matthew Chance reported, “the timing...looks most suspicious,” with Whelan “detained just weeks after Russian gun-enthusiast Maria Butina, held in the US, pleaded guilty to conspiracy after US prosecutors accused her of trying to infiltrate the NRA and the Republican Party.” Chance added that Huntsman “personally called the family of Paul Whelan to discuss his condition with them, a sign of just how seriously the United States is taking this case.” Hans Nichols reported on NBC Nightly News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=050-08c&t=c> (1/2, story 4, 1:00, Holt) that Whelan is “getting the first visit from US embassy officials in a Moscow jail.” Meanwhile, “questions remain about why he was arrested for espionage.” Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=051-fe5&t=c> (1/1, Milliken, Tétrault-Farber) reports, “The United States wants an explanation for why Russia detained a former U.S. Marine on spying charges in Moscow and will demand his immediate return if it determines his detention is inappropriate,” Pompeo said on Wednesday. The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=052-0c7&t=c> (1/2, Ferris-Rotman) reports Huntsman meet with “Whelan at Lefortovo Detention Facility, a notorious prison that has held many spies and political prisoners in spartan conditions.” Meanwhile, “many details of Whelan’s arrest and condition since then remain unknown,” and he may not have been formally charged with espionage. Meanwhile, “U.S. officials are concerned about the delay between his arrest and the consular visit, believing it violates the time frame dictated by the Vienna Convention.” Sen.-elect Mitt Romney (R-UT) said on CNN’s The Lead[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=053-705&t=c> (1/2), “I think it’s important to be clear-eyed with regards to Vladimir Putin. And Russia has a real problem. Their population is shrinking. Their work force is shrinking. ... And they’re in trouble. And as a result, Putin is looking for more of an economic industrial base. So he’s looking at the former satellite states of the Soviet Union. And America has to make it very, very clear in our communication and in the things we do that that’s not acceptable to us and to the world.” Romney added, “I think it’s very important for this President to make it clear to Vladimir Putin, we will not accept forays.” The Detroit Free Press <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=054-1b6&t=c> (1/2, Howard) reports Hermitage Capital Management Bill Browder, who was expelled by Vladimir Putin in 2005, said that Whelan is being held “hostage,” as the standard protocol is to deport suspected spies. Browder, “an outspoken critic of Russian corruption and Putin specifically,” suggested the move is a “desperate” attempt by Putin “to disrupt the investigation led by Robert Mueller into alleged corruption of the U.S. election system.” Browder called for the US to “respond extremely aggressively,” warning, “if Americans can be grabbed by corrupt dictators for political purposes, you can be assured more Americans will be taken hostage in other countries.” Also covering this story are USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=055-1bf&t=c> (1/2, Shesgreen) and the Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=056-a7c&t=c> (1/2, Berry, Heintz). Pompeo, Bolsonaro Discuss Working Together On Venezuela, Cuba, And Nicaragua. Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=057-2b3&t=c> (1/2) reports that the State Department says that while in Brazil, Secretary of State Pompeo “discussed supporting a return to democracy in Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua with Brazil’s new right-wing government...in a joint effort against what he called authoritarian regimes in Latin America.” According to Reuters, Pompeo and Brazilian Foreign Minister Ernesto Araujo “considered deepening cooperation in the region at a meeting in Brasilia following Tuesday’s inauguration of far-right President Jair Bolsonaro.” State Department Deputy Spokesman Robert Palladino said Pompeo “later met with Bolsonaro and also broached the question of ‘reinforcing democratic governance and human rights’ in those three countries.” Shanahan: Pentagon’s Focus Should Be On China. Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=058-2a1&t=c> (1/2, Stewart, Ali) reports that acting Defense Secretary Shanahan “told civilian leaders of the U.S. military on Wednesday to focus on ‘China, China, China.’” According to Reuters, “The comments came during Shanahan’s first meeting with secretaries of the U.S. military branches since taking over for Jim Mattis.” Reuters says Shanahan has been “described...as an advocate of the Pentagon’s toughening stance toward Beijing,” and “played a critical role in developing the strategy, which singled out China and Russia as top threats, saying they wanted to ‘shape a world consistent with their authoritarian model.’” Citing an unnamed “defense official,” the AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=059-114&t=c> (1/2, Burns) reports that Shanahan “told the Pentagon gathering that he is focused on the strategy as developed and put in place under Mattis.” According to the AP, Shanahan’s “views on strategic issues such as U.S. alliances and the wars in Afghanistan and Syria are largely unknown to the public.” *Former Treasury Secretary Calls For Joint US-China Action On Climate Change, Nuclear Weapons. *Former Treasury Secretary Robert E. Rubin, in an op-ed in the New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=05a-e61&t=c> (1/2), calls for creating “a climate that encourages elected officials to pursue a constructive relationship” with China, due to “our imperative self-interest in working together on hugely consequential transnational issues,” especially climate change and the spread of nuclear weapons, which will require the two countries to work together if they are to be slowed. In the US, “structural trade issues” and “aggressive geopolitical moves,” which are “legitimate concerns,” have created “a vicious cycle” of negative developments increasingly sapping support for a cooperative relationship with China. However, “the best chance for successfully dealing with these overarching issues” and with more traditional issues for the US and China “to catalyze global action.” Rubin concludes, “For the future of humanity, not to mention our immediate economic interests, our two countries must recognize our mutual self-interest in a constructive relationship and act accordingly.” Xi: Taiwan Can Become Part Of China Without Giving Up Its “Different System.” The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=05b-3bb&t=c> (1/2, Buckley, Horton) reports that in a speech, Chinese President Xi Jinping “declared...that he wants progress on China’s decades-long quest to win control of Taiwan,” and “stressed how vital unification with Taiwan is to his vision of Chinese national rejuvenation.” The Times says this was Xi’s “first major speech about the disputed island.” According to the Times, Xi “did not lay down a timetable for absorbing Taiwan, which is something more hawkish voices in Beijing have urged,” but “he indicated that his patience had limits and that he wanted to bring Taiwan into ever-closer political, economic and cultural orbit around China.” Xi’s “proposal appeared unlikely to win over” the Taiwanese, according to the Times, “who have seen Hong Kong’s freedoms in rapid retreat under a similar deal.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=05c-954&t=c> (1/2, Shih) reports that Xi said that while his government “seeks the ‘peaceful unification’ of Taiwan,” he “will not rule out the threat of military action.” However, the Post says Xi also “reiterated an appeal to the 23 million citizens of the island democracy: If Taiwan submits to Chinese rule, he said, it would enjoy lasting peace and its own system of governance under a ‘one country, two systems’ model, much like Hong Kong.” Xi is quoted as saying: “Different systems are not an obstacle to unification, and even less are they an excuse for separatism. ... The private property, religious beliefs and legitimate rights and interests of our Taiwanese compatriots will be fully assured.” The Los Angeles Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=05d-018&t=c> (1/2, Dixon) reports Xi “warned Taiwan that independence would be disastrous” in a speech that served as “a rebuttal to” Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen’s New Year’s speech calling for China to respect Taiwan’s existence and democratic heritage. The Times adds that “Xi’s speech aimed to entice young Taiwanese with the hopes of joining China’s economic advance,” but it also “underscored the gulf between the governments.” Taking a different tone, the Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=05e-42a&t=c> (1/2, Taylor) reports that Xi “stated outright on Wednesday that Beijing’s goal is to absorb Taiwan and that China could use ‘force’ to achieve the goal if necessary,” a reference that “drew rousing applause from the crowd.” The Times predicts the speech will “elevate tension.” AP Analysis: Israeli Settlement Building Has Accelerated Since Trump Took Office. The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=05f-47e&t=c> (1/2, Federman) reports, “With little resistance from a friendly White House, Israel has launched a new settlement push in the West Bank...laying the groundwork for what could be the largest construction binge in years.” The AP adds, “The figures, gathered from official government sources by the anti-settlement monitoring group Peace Now, show an increase in building in 2018 and a sharp spike in planning for future construction.” According to the AP, “This trend, highlighted last week when an Israeli committee advanced plans for thousands more settlement homes on war-won lands, has only deepened Palestinian mistrust of the Trump administration as it says it is preparing to roll out a Mideast peace plan.” *CEO: Palestinians Should Become Citizens Of Jordan. *In an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=060-0d2&t=c> (1/2), Xerion Investments CEO Daniel J. Arbess argues that the solution to peace between Israel and Palestinians is a Jordan-Israel confederacy with Jordan as the Palestinian state. Under such a deal, the Arabs in the West Bank would become Jordanian citizens and that county would assume administrative responsibility for them, while the land would be Israeli territory. The deal would also enfranchise the Palestinian majority in Jordan and remove power from the corrupt, illegitimate, and unpopular leaders of the Palestinian Authority. Arbess argues that Jordan’s king would agree to such a deal in exchange for protection for his precarious rule. Domestic Policy Trump To Romney: “Be A TEAM Player & WIN.” After Sen.-elect Mitt Romney (R-UT) criticized the President in an op-ed for the Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=061-af6&t=c>, Trump took to Twitter <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=062-d73&t=c> yesterday morning to write, “Here we go with Mitt Romney, but so fast! Question will be, is he a Flake? I hope not. Would much prefer that Mitt focus on Border Security and so many other things where he can be helpful. I won big, and he didn’t. He should be happy for all Republicans. Be a TEAM player & WIN!” The CBS Evening News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=063-9fd&t=c> (1/2, story 2, 1:45, Glor) showed Trump saying during a Cabinet meeting, “Well, I wish Mitt could be more of a team player. If he fought really hard against President Obama, like he does against me, he would have won the election.” With that comment, says Breitbart <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=064-8d3&t=c> (1/2, Spiering), “Trump further ridiculed” Romney for “continuing to criticize him and his presidency.” NBC Nightly News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=065-4a4&t=c> (1/2, story 2, 0:55, Holt) points out Trump was “firing back after a scathing attack from...Romney that leaves some to ask: could Romney challenge the President in 2020?” NBC’s Kristen Welker added Romney is “insisting he has no plans for a showdown against the President.” The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=066-0c9&t=c> (1/2, Martin, Haberman, Burns) says White House officials “only got a brief head’s up that the [op-ed] was coming,” and that it was RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel, who is Romney’s niece, who “informed them about the piece.” Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=067-db3&t=c> (1/2, Okun) reports, “In the reinvigorated feud between her uncle...and her boss,” McDaniel “has picked a side: the president’s.” Tweeted McDaniel, “POTUS is attacked and obstructed by the MSM media and Democrats 24/7. ... For an incoming Republican freshman senator to attack @realDonaldTrump as their first act feeds into what the Democrats and media want and is disappointing and unproductive.” The Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=068-057&t=c> (1/2, Bender) similarly reports Trump’s comments under the headline “Trump Predicts Romney Will Fall In Line Behind Him.” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=069-d47&t=c> (1/2, Freking) notes that in 2016, Romney “said there was plenty of evidence that Trump was ‘a con man, a fake.’” The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=06a-f50&t=c> (1/2, Bowden) reports, however, that “despite being a frequent critic of Trump’s during the 2016 election, Romney thanked Trump for his support during his 2018 Senate run,” and “was briefly considered to be in the running to serve as Trump’s secretary of State in 2017.” Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=06b-cb3&t=c> (1/2, Okun) reports “many Trump opponents have hoped” that Romney “might take up the mantle of Flake and other departing Republican critics in the Senate,” and Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=06c-79a&t=c> (1/2, Heavey, Cornwell) that “public criticism” of Trump “from Republican lawmakers has been rare,” and “it was unclear whether any other prominent members of the party would feel emboldened to criticize Trump ahead of his presumed 2020 re-election bid.” Romney was asked on CNN’s The Lead[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=06d-988&t=c> (1/2) why he chose to write the Washington Post op-ed now. Romney said, “I actually wrote a very similar op-ed before I got into the primary in Utah and laid out my views with regards to the President and his presidency. And noted that I will work with the President as I would, frankly, with any President, which is on those areas where I’m in agreement, we’ll be able to work together. Where I disagree, I’ll point that out. But in matters that relate to the divisiveness that’s been part of our political environment, I’ll speak out if I feel a need to, if there is something significant. And I think it’s important, as I begin this new job, to make it very clear where I stand.” Sean Hannity said on Fox News’ Hannity[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=06e-8d3&t=c> (1/2), “It’s sad he has more interest in cozying up to those people on the left that hated him than sticking up for protecting American citizens, record low unemployment, American energy independence, securing our borders, issues he says he [cares] about.” On CBS This Morning[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=06f-707&t=c> (1/2), it was noted that Trump 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale responded to Romney’s op-ed with the tweet: “The truth is Mitt Romney lacked the ability to save this nation and President Trump has.” On Fox News’ Fox & Friends[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019010301biden&r=email-63ec&l=070-b19&t=c> (1/2), David Bossie, who served deputy manager of President Trump’s 2016 campaign, said Romney’s op-ed is “a pathetic attempt...for relevancy.” Bossie added, “Let’s talk about jealousy. let’s talk about how shallow this person is. I’m sick and tired of Mitt Romney wanting Donald Trump’s help on one hand, grovelling, trying to be the secretary of state in the transition during 2016. Let’s note forget that pathetic attempt by Mitt Romney.” Bossie added, “[Romney] has run for president and if he wasn’t so incompetent he would have won that campaign, to be candid. ... Mitt Romney failed in that campaign and he failed the American people who have made him the nominee. He ran a terrible general election campaign.”
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AQGVEo7pVqsmMVZnR8iOSjaZw8doXaYcunDg
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<0.0.0.23.1D4A363D5BF6B05.0@colo033.bulletinnews.com>
REFS:
<0.0.0.23.1D4A363D5BF6B05.0@colo033.bulletinnews.com>