DATA TIMESTAMP
SENDER IDENTIFIER
SUBJECT & CONTENT PREVIEW
TS:
2010-09-24 01:14:23
ID:
ncallahan@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
hey
Very good time spent today with Jay. He's a stud. Some ideas on the RSP
Security and RSP Analytics front that we want to blow out. Will have
something by tomorrow to talk to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
Neil Callahan
Rosemont Seneca
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-24 00:44:00
ID:
ncallahan@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Rosemont Seneca - Becker Burke - Credit Suisse
No readable content available
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-24 00:16:44
ID:
261penn@gmail.com
SUBJ:
Fwd: Beau's speech -- basic outline
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Alexander Snyder-Mackler <smacklera@gmail.com>
> Date: September 23, 2010 7:05:16 PM EDT
> To: "ABlinken@aol.com" <ablinken@aol.com>, ted kaufman <tedkaufman@comcast.net>
> Cc: BB <261penn@gmail.com>, Acdonilon <acdonilon@aol.com>, Joe Rogalsky <joerogalsky@gmail.co
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-23 23:48:39
ID:
ssingham@ssd.com
SUBJ:
RE: FOIA/Legal
Virginia:
FOIA
This is usually part of the judicial review procedure of FTA's action
that we have discussed. The letter itself is a very straightforward
letter (a one page request). That's ready to go if you want to do it.
The reason to do that now is as follows. If we believe, and I think our
int
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-23 23:48:32
ID:
dburrell@rosemontrealty.com
SUBJ:
also
I can just pick you up tomorrow night if you want and then we can all head into the office together, then to golf. Its just a lot easier. But anyway, whatever is best, just wanted to be helpful.
Daniel C. Burrell
Chief Executive Officer
330 Garfield St | Santa Fe, NM 87501
505.992.5100 ph | 505.982
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-23 22:32:06
ID:
virginia.verdeja@cafusa.com
SUBJ:
RE: FOIA/Legal
Shanker and all,
I'm puzzled by your last sentence. Also I just spoke with Josu and we
are not sure why the FOIA request now. Also we need a budget for this
task including review of documentation provided by FTA. Josu, Tomar and
I think we have written enough legal letters for now. If we are not
s
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-23 22:27:36
ID:
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Fwd:
let's discuss. works scheduling-wise but want to have conversation on this before we commit to the call.
Eric D. Schwerin
Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC
1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW
Suite 705
Washington, DC 20007
(202) 333-1880
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
P Consider the environment before printing this
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-23 22:07:36
ID:
mikeg@stevesix.com
SUBJ:
Today's debate
<body><span style="font-size: 15px; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; line-height: 140%;"><a href="http://images.myngp.com/LinkTracker.aspx?crypt=IVi0ax2%2b6UBSinc%2fCPYaKYkwjdB%2bjCUC42pMEQXc2gawa%2fCWJ9kd%2bHfYhFyhtD8Q80udFXBmTLkrKFbvDAPLtfjd7WCWRZTmlZgVvCaGdYYcbGOUzS2
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-23 22:00:31
ID:
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Re: Nats Tix
You coming back? Don't need you, but have a couple of quick things if you are.
Eric D. Schwerin
Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC
1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW
Suite 705
Washington, DC 20007
(202) 333-1880
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
P Consider the environment before printing this email.
On Sep 23, 2010,
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-23 21:49:15
ID:
smacklera@gmail.com
SUBJ:
Pew: Independents now for GOP
<http://www.politico.com/>
*Pew: Independents now for GOP*
By: Jeanne Cummings
September 23, 2010 03:03 PM EDT
In an ominous sign for President Barack
Obama<http://topics.politico.com/index.cfm/topic/BarackObama>and
congressional Democrats, independent voters now favor Republicans by
nearly the sa
VIEW