DATA TIMESTAMP
SENDER IDENTIFIER
SUBJECT & CONTENT PREVIEW
TS:
2017-01-29 23:38:41
ID:
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Re: Per our conversation
To be clear, Jim and Sara don't currently have any legal obligation to turn
this over as far as I can tell. The request came to Hunter. If Hunter
doesn't have them or can't get access to them then I believe you (Hunter)
can just say that. I would assume if Kathleen still wants them then
she'll subpo
VIEW
TS:
2017-01-29 23:36:44
ID:
hbiden@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Fwd: My parents
See below. And by the way of that 4K about 1200 of it was spent by the girls and or you (if not you should check to see who is buying wine from postmates and using it almost everyday at solid core).
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Eric Schwerin <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>
VIEW
TS:
2017-01-29 23:24:45
ID:
hbiden@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Re: Daughter Genevieve in LA today. The shirt is older than she is. All warm wishes to you as always. Mark
So cool---and so beautiful.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 29, 2017, at 4:44 PM, Mark Angelson <maangelson@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> <IMG_0604.JPG>
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
VIEW
TS:
2017-01-29 23:23:58
ID:
hbiden@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Re: AT&T Subpoenas
I don't care but wha is the possible reason for needing my phone records in no fault jurisdiction? And hey are e not doing the same?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 29, 2017, at 5:52 PM, Eric Schwerin <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com> wrote:
>
> FYI, we received notices at the office from AT&T that they
VIEW
TS:
2017-01-29 23:22:11
ID:
hbiden@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Re: Per our conversation
Before you go to all the trouble see what your legally obligated to do. If you have a right to not answer their question for a reason then don't. This is absurd.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 29, 2017, at 5:52 PM, Sara Biden <sbiden@lionhallgp.com> wrote:
>
> Yikes!!
> I'll try! I'll get you what I
VIEW
TS:
2017-01-29 22:56:43
ID:
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Re: Per our conversation
Thanks! I am hopeful there really isn’t much of anything to provide as the request only covers 1/1/14 to the present.
There are some other similar requests that we are doing our best to comply with but won’t be able to meet the deadline. Even a date as to when we can provide the info or why we can’
VIEW
TS:
2017-01-29 22:52:48
ID:
sbiden@lionhallgp.com
SUBJ:
Re: Per our conversation
Yikes!!
I'll try! I'll get you what I have. What Rick may have may take longet!
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 29, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Eric Schwerin <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com<mailto:eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com>> wrote:
Thanks, Sara. Turns out the deadline is actually Tuesday if you can get it by t
VIEW
TS:
2017-01-29 22:52:26
ID:
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
AT&T Subpoenas
FYI, we received notices at the office from AT&T that they had been subpoenaed to provide phone records for 202-552-9396 (Hunter’s cell issued by work) and 202-333-5198 (Hunter’s direct office land line - which isn’t an account with AT&T). AT&T said they will respond on 2/5/17 unless they hear from
VIEW
TS:
2017-01-29 21:50:43
ID:
email@politicoemail.com
SUBJ:
POLITICO Breaking News
President Donald Trump on Sunday defended his executive order barring refugees and some legal immigrants from entering the United States, even as one of his top aides walked back part of the order -- a sign of confusion and fissures within the 10-day-old administration.
"America is a proud nation o
VIEW
TS:
2017-01-29 21:44:56
ID:
maangelson@aol.com
SUBJ:
Daughter Genevieve in LA today. The shirt is older than she is. All warm wishes to you as always. Mark
No readable content available
VIEW