DATA TIMESTAMP
SENDER IDENTIFIER
SUBJECT & CONTENT PREVIEW
TS:
2010-09-03 00:06:45
ID:
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Re: So, on to more important things...
Yup. You'll be fine on a QB.
Eric D. Schwerin
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 2, 2010, at 8:03 PM, Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com> wrote:
> So when I get 1st pick in 10 person draft my next pick is 20 and the 21- is that right?
>
> R. Hunter Biden
> 202-333-1880
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-03 00:12:17
ID:
noreply@politico.com
SUBJ:
POLITICO Alert: Ben Smith has published a new story.
<p><strong>Ben Smith</strong> has published a new story:<p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0910/41729.html">Happy beginning for a W.H. production</a></strong></p>
<p>The talks allow Obama to show on the foreign policy stage.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stor
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-03 00:40:13
ID:
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Re: So, on to more important things...
Or Romo.
Eric D. Schwerin
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 2, 2010, at 8:39 PM, Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com> wrote:
> I'll end up with Rivers
>
> R. Hunter Biden
> 202-333-1880
>
>
> On Sep 2, 2010, at 8:06 PM, Eric Schwerin <eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com> wrote
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-03 00:53:15
ID:
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Re: So, on to more important things...
RB2 definitely. Next spot should be WR or QB. Most draft experts would tell you WR. Because you shouldn't wait until round 4 for a WR especially if you start 3 WRs. Also depends if QB's get 4 pts or 6 pts per TD pass and whether you award points per reception or just based on yardage. You also just
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-03 00:59:48
ID:
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Re: So, on to more important things...
Don't pick TE or Defense until late rounds or at least until you have your two RBs, 1WR and 1QB. If no one has picked a TE by round 4 you may want to consider it. Also depends again if they award points per reception. If so, I'd pick a TE earlier (still not before 4th pick).
Eric D. Schwerin
eschwe
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-03 02:42:21
ID:
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
COD is the headline at HuffPost right now.....
--
Eric D. Schwerin
Rosemont Seneca Partners
(202) 333-1880
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.co
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-03 06:38:13
ID:
statement.090310.663709725@alerts.wellsfargoadvisors.com
SUBJ:
Online Statement Notification
A new Wells Fargo Advisors statement is available for account ending 4982.
Please log in and view your documents by selecting Account Statements under the Accounts and Services tab. If you have questions, you may contact us at (877) 879-2495.
For accounts that are in a Statement Linked Service, th
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-03 09:26:00
ID:
morningscore@politico.com
SUBJ:
POLITICO's Morning Score: Ayotte gets Coburn - Romney to boost Kirk - Friday standings: Sabato up, Schilling down - Glickman stumps in Kansas - Can Hoffman hold tea party? - Brewer: 'Longest 16 seconds'
<p>By Alexander Burns (@aburnspolitico, <a href="mailto:aburns@politico.com">aburns@politico.com</a>) <br />
<br />
<strong>SCORE EXCLUSIVE I - THE DOCTOR IS IN</strong>: Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn is endorsing former New Hampshire Attorney General Kelly Ayotte for Senate today, giving the GOP frontru
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-03 14:02:44
ID:
info@messages.whitehouse.gov
SUBJ:
Daily Snapshot: Dispatches from Iraq
Your Daily Snapshot for
Friday, September 3, 2010
[http://www.whitehouse.gov/salute?utm_source=090310&utm_medium=image&utm_campaign=daily]
West Wing Week: Dispatches from Iraq
[http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/09/03/west-wing-week-dispatches-iraqe?utm_source=090310&utm_medium=image&utm_campa
VIEW
TS:
2010-09-03 14:21:42
ID:
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Other Political Activities
Just some thoughts, some of which is not original thinking and a lot of it is based on conversations I had with with Hunter already. Also, I am sure people like Mike D have more useful advice than I.
When you are thinking of helping other candidates the next 65 days I think you should only focus on
VIEW