DATA TIMESTAMP
SENDER IDENTIFIER
SUBJECT & CONTENT PREVIEW
TS:
2012-06-10 10:11:46
ID:
customerrelations@dhakaregency.com
SUBJ:
Pizza Extravaganza @ Dhaka Regency
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<title>Dear Friends,</title>
<style>
<!--
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
p.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#000066;}
-->
</style>
</head>
VIEW
TS:
2012-06-09 20:22:27
ID:
info@russcarnahan.com
SUBJ:
60 Days to Victory
<body><style>body {font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt}</style><P><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial,sans-serif; FONT-SIZE: 11pt">Dear Robert,</SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial,sans-serif; FONT-SIZE: 11pt">After months of uncertainty but over a year of preparation, Congressman Russ Carnahan
VIEW
TS:
2012-06-09 18:54:25
ID:
ncallahan@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Re: Backplane and KZs
FYI, the max allocation we could get on backplane would be $8m. We could push for more.
-------------------
Neil Callahan
917-945-9516
On Jun 9, 2012, at 5:19 AM, Devon Archer <darcher@rosemontseneca.com> wrote:
> Ok good. They currently have OSI memo etc. so let's have similar package for Backpl
VIEW
TS:
2012-06-09 18:49:38
ID:
info@messages.whitehouse.gov
SUBJ:
A "State Dinner" just for kids
The White House Saturday, June 9, 2012
A "State Dinner" just for kids
Calling all kid chefs: Here's your chance to share your favorite delicious and nutritious lunch recipe with First Lady Michelle Obama.
"Let's Move!", the First Lady's initiative to solve the problem of childhood obesity within
VIEW
TS:
2012-06-09 17:56:28
ID:
democraticparty@democrats.org
SUBJ:
They outraised us
The Democratic Party
-----------------------
Robert --
This week we learned Mitt Romney and the Republican Party
outraised us in May, bringing in $76 million to our $60
million. And that deficit is even worse once you include
the millions of dollars a few wealthy special interests and
billionaires
VIEW
TS:
2012-06-09 17:03:42
ID:
ncallahan@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Re: Rand Review & Chat
We need the indemnification language, that protects us as well.
It's month to month, not three months.
I would have loved your feedback earlier, but i think we are too far down the road. And in the first month, I don't think we need a lot of input form RSP other than coming up with a list of prosp
VIEW
TS:
2012-06-09 16:46:30
ID:
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Re: Rand Review & Chat
Ok - I get it. Just think you are being short sighted and decreasing our chances of renewal after three months but sounds like we are already down the road. Let's do a call with Rob a week from Monday.
I had a longer contract template that we use for our hedge fund clients with a ton of legalese on
VIEW
TS:
2012-06-09 16:15:42
ID:
ncallahan@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Re: Rand Review & Chat
If we go back and say lets start in July, we'd be sending a wrong message. These are fast moving deal guys/ entrepreneurs. We could have set that expectation earlier, but I think we are too far into the conversation.
And In this eat what you kill arrangement, I am very hungry. I can't sit back.
Th
VIEW
TS:
2012-06-09 16:01:29
ID:
eschwerin@rosemontseneca.com
SUBJ:
Re: Rand Review & Chat
I know you'd really like to get some cash in the door sooner rather than later but I think a July, August, September engagement makes more sense given August's deadness. Under this scenario we have a partial month in June and the contract ends and is up for renewal in the dead month of August. Just
VIEW
TS:
2012-06-09 15:48:17
ID:
mdoyle1031@aol.com
SUBJ:
Fwd: instructions for team building
Dude,
See below. If you are in Michigan maybe you and the girls would want to come over and run with us. I should be a great day, lots of fun AND you will get a really cool Rags of Honor tee shirt. I know Kathleen can run 3 miles.!!
If not lets try to catch up while you are here, I would love to se
VIEW